Worker & Community Struggles and Protests Madrid Police "Dumbfounded" After Amazon Called The Cops On Striking Workers 22:31 Nov 27 0 comments George Soros’ Open Society Foundation unmasked in a major leak 22:31 Aug 24 1 comments Shell in court over major Corrib gas refinery flaring events. 23:32 Jul 28 0 comments Eddie Hobbs: Largest act of larceny against Irish people 23:22 Jun 02 0 comments CHASE Fundraising Events Calendar for June 23:10 Jun 01 0 comments tuileadh >> |
Defence Forces refusing to participate in strike-breaking
national |
worker & community struggles and protests |
other press
Thursday February 05, 2009 03:52 by Blacbloc
A lot of people have probably wondered whether the government were planning to strong arm strikers and resort to dirty measures to intimidate workers. Looks like that option may not be available to them. Soldiers are saying they support the opposition to the pension levy. Report in today's Irish Times that Pdfora are refusing to cooperate with any requests to get involved. It's not clear whether they had been asked or not - Willie O' Dea is equivocal so the answer is probably yes. If the soldiers hold good to their word then the government must surely be forced to reverse their management of the situation. We want to see the people responsible for this bearing the full brunt of it. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 4 3 2 1The purpose of the State is to protect the propertied from the 'lower classes'.
The state forces are mostly drawn not from the privileged but from the working class.
If the members of these forces refuse to defend the privileged and join in solidarity with their fellow workers this move is greatly to be welcomed.
It signals a serious blow to the power of the state to oppress.
Employers, the meeja, academics, politicians have all joined in a chorus of anti-working class rhetoric, blaming the workers for the current economic mess.
They have no solutions to the crisis. Just bombast and bamboozlement.
Solidarity of the army with the their fellow workers will cause real fear among the unproductive, oppressing stratum.
The article NOWHERE defends or suggests the role of the army is anything other than what it is. The POINT is that if even the army are backing off defending this cut, and refusing to engage in coercing workers who protest by strikebreaking or scab labour, the government has nowhere to go.
Duh!
So doing un-military things like guarding prisons, providing security for banks, keep an eye on the plane spotters at Shannon, backing up the Shell security in Mayo, even entering beauty contests (see link) are all okay for the free state army, but when it comes to something that might hit them in their own pockets they suddenly get a conscience...
Yeah right.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/0205/1....html