Upcoming Events

Dublin | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

Dublin

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Further Evidence Gaza Casualty Numbers Are Fake Thu Mar 28, 2024 17:36 | Will Jones
The evidence that the Gaza casualty numbers from the Hamas-run Health Ministry (now over 32,000) are wildly inflated continues to mount. Mark Zlochin looks at what the proportions of male and female UNRWA workers tell us.
The post Further Evidence Gaza Casualty Numbers Are Fake appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Don?t Be Fooled by the ?Britain is Growing? Fairytales Thu Mar 28, 2024 15:22 | David Craig
Don't be fooled by the 'Britain is growing' fairytales, says David Craig. Any 'growth' is accounted for by the hike in the benefits bill and in civil servants' pay and a heap of other unproductive deficit spending.
The post Don’t Be Fooled by the ‘Britain is Growing’ Fairytales appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Climate: The Movie is a Perfect Cure for Climate Anxiety Thu Mar 28, 2024 13:00 | Toby Young
Climate Change: The Movie, the new film by Martin Durkin, should be shown at every school in the country to disabuse anxious young people of the idea that we're in the midst of a 'climate emergency'.
The post Climate: The Movie is a Perfect Cure for Climate Anxiety appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The WHO?s Plot to Seize Power Over Nation States in Future Pandemics Must Be Stopped Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:12 | Will Jones
The World Health Organisation is gearing up to persuade the world's governments to sign a new pandemic treaty that would allow the unelected body to seize power over nation states in future pandemics, warns Matt Ridley.
The post The WHO’s Plot to Seize Power Over Nation States in Future Pandemics Must Be Stopped appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Easter Quiz: Why Are White Things So White? Thu Mar 28, 2024 09:00 | Steven Tucker
It's hard to tell the difference these days between genuine news stories relating to 'anti-racist' ? or, more realistically, anti-white ? ideas and the spoofs and fakes. Pit your wits against our Easter quiz.
The post Easter Quiz: Why Are White Things So White? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Moscow attack reminds us of the links between Islamists and Kiev's fundamentalis... Tue Mar 26, 2024 06:57 | en

offsite link Failure to assist a people in danger of genocide, by Hassan Hamadé Tue Mar 26, 2024 06:32 | en

offsite link Yugoslavia March 24, 1999 The Founding War of the New Nato, by Manlio Dinucci Sun Mar 24, 2024 05:15 | en

offsite link France opposes Russian Korean-style peace project in Ukraine Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:11 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°79 Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:40 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Selling off the Dublin Mountains

category dublin | environment | feature author Tuesday December 04, 2012 10:05author by dublin rambler Report this post to the editors

DL-Rathdown vote on rezoning Dec 10th

Our political parties are at it again. They can't seem to stop. They are rezoning land in areas where the County Manager has already strongly opposed it and as usual FF councillors are at the forefront with FG very close behind. You would think that something might change after FF has led this country to economic ruin and has saddled everyone with debt that has nothing to do with them, restarted emigration and condemned the young, old and sick to cutbacks and poverty for an indefinite period with no end in sight. It all just goes to show the huge democratic deficit in this country and the fact that these self-serving political parties and their developer friends don't give a damn about anyone, the environment or our common future. And so we feel it is important to featurize this local but important story below.

Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown councillors are to vote on a murky rezoning project near Tibradden in the Dublin Mountains on December 10th, which breaches the county development plan and national policy, as well as policy on siting of facilities for older people. Most crucially it breaches the current limits of the no-building areas in the Dublin / Wicklow Mountains, which are a vital amenity for the whole community.

To date a majority of local councillors have been in favour, against the advice of the planners and even the County Manager - but have not explained their reasons for voting yes to this development. It will create a "retirement village" cut off from library, churches and other community contacts: perhaps isolation facility would be a better term. Despite all the scandals, it seems to be "business at usual" over at DL-Rathdown...

featured image
Location of so-called retirement village

Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown councillors are to vote on a murky rezoning project near Tibradden in the Dublin Mountains on December 10th, which breaches the county development plan and national policy, as well as policy on siting of facilities for older people. Most crucially it breaches the current limits of the no-building areas in the Dublin / Wicklow Mountains, which are a vital amenity for the whole community.

To date a majority of local councillors have been in favour, against the advice of the planners and even the County Manager - but have not explained their reasons for voting yes to this development. It will create a "retirement village" cut off from library, churches and other community contacts: perhaps isolation facility would be a better term. Despite all the scandals, it seems to be "business at usual" over at DL-Rathdown...

Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Councillors are going to take a final vote on December 10th, about whether to permit a change of zoning for part of the Ticknock area of the Dublin Mountains (between Kellystown Road and Ticknock Road on S side of M 50) to facilitate the development of a 'retirement village' there. A majority of our local Councillors have so far been in favour, though they have not given any reasons why.

The development appears to be of potential benefit to the developer only but not to older people themselves (who will be isolated in this facility, against best practice and current policy) or to the community as a whole (who will see another chunk of open space rezoned for private profit). It also breaches the current limits of the protected area of the Dublin / Wicklow Mountains.

Campaigners are asking local residents to contact those councillors who voted in favour of this at an earlier stage and ask them to vote against on the 10th. Do give your name and address when you make contact, so it is obvious that you are a local constituent and voter.

Background:

The proposal was put to public consultation in October. Now, in advance of the December 10th meeting, the County Manager has produced a report on the submissions, summarising and commenting on all those received. There were 67 well-argued submissions opposing the proposal, and 24 supporting it - most of these say nothing more than 'we support the development - it will be good for the area' but give no concrete reasons (wonder who wrote those?) A small number of submissions were 'neutral'.

There was one submission on behalf of the promoter of the retirement village scheme, citing local demand for such developments (not apparently researched or otherwise detailed), the fact that it will be a self-contained, secure environment (all services, shops etc. on site so residents won't need to go anywhere else! - he also says its attraction will be that services there will not be open to the general public). He also claims that a number of jobs would be created locally. But he has provided very few details of the proposed scale of the development and the facilities envisaged in addition to housing, some shops and some (presumably private) medical services.

The link to the plan on the DLR site is here and documents and maps here and Variation No. 9 Strategic Environmental Assessment Determination

Reasons against (given by those objecting):

1) The proposal is contrary to the decisions of the County Development Plan (as agreed by the Councillors) and contrary to stated local and national housing policy, which states that any new development for older people should be situated within existing communities and have access to all services ('communities for all ages' or 'sustainable communities').

2) If there is demand in the County for 'retirement villages', there are sufficient other lands available in the County, within existing residential areas and already zoned residential, which could be developed.

3) The development would have a serious impact on the visual amenity aspect of the Dublin Mountains Foothills (there are 'preserved views' which would be obstructed) and particularly on the recreational/open space aspect.

4) The Dublin Mountains are an essential amenity for the whole city (and for the many visitors who come here) - they belong to all of us, and to our children and grandchildren.

5) The site is on the South - mountain - side of the M 50, which has been and should permanently remain the boundary of the built up area.

6) Problems with the site itself include: inadequate road network locally, with potential traffic hazards – and a dangerous junction (the only access is via Ticknock Rd) ; it's a steep and exposed site, not exactly suitable weather-wise for older people; inadequately serviced in terms of water and drainage/ sewage – there are problems in Ticknock area already; any footpaths within the 'village' would have no connections with any footpaths in the surrounding area; serious noise pollution can be expected from M50 nearby.

7) Most active older people need and want to be involved in local community activities, and would want easy access to churches, library, cinema etc.which the siting of this ‘village’ clearly would not offer. They/ we do not want to be segregated and hidden away with only their/ our own age group for company! [ Or do those in favour envisage a village intended only for those who are sick and frail ?]

8) Nearest public transport is a bus stop two-thirds of a kilometre away with a service running only once every hour which does not connect to Dundrum, the nearest obvious centre.

9) If this development is permitted, it would be a very dangerous precedent for other encroachments on the open space/ wild areas of the Dublin Mountains.

County Manager’s view

The County Manager has strongly opposed this development from the start, for all these good reasons and more, and he has pointed out that other planning applications for developments on this site have been turned down by An Bord Pleanala for similar reasons.

He has not been presented with any evidence by those in favour (including Councillors in favour) which would make him change his mind. So it does seem that this is 'an unconvincing scheme, designed solely to serve developer interests'.

This development does not serve the real needs of older people, and certainly not those of the wider local community in this County and beyond. Let’s keep our mountains safe from further development, and prevent the construction of this isolation facility for the sake of private profit. Local voters should challenge those councillors who have voted for this so far but have failed to give any reason for doing so.

Below is a list of the voting record last time (July 2011) along with Councillors’ email addresses and 'business' mobile phone numbers. DAC means a member of the "Dundrum Area Committee" (ie councillors for Dundrum, Stillorgan and Sandyford / Glencullen).

Previous Vote in July on the Village:

Councillor Vote Yes/No Contact Details
Bailey, John F. FG jbailey@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 8324523
Bailey, Maria FG mbailey@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 1019750
Baker, Marie FG mbaker@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 8186704
Bhreathnach, Niamh LAB x nbreathna@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 6078193
Boyhan, Victor IND vboyhan@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 2350382
Brennan, Aoife FF DAC abrennan@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814516
Devlin, Cormac FF cdevlin@cllr.dlrcoco.ie O86 8186814
Dillon Byrne, Jane LAB x No email address 086 6078150
Fitzpatrick, Stephen LAB x sfitzpatrick@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814519
Fox, Tony IND DAC tonyfox@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 6086903
Halpin, Melisa PBP x mhalpin@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 3805793
Hand, Pat FG DAC phand@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 6078181
Horkan, Gerry FF DAC ghorkan@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 3881531
Humphreys, Richard LAB DAC x rhumphreys@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814518
Joyce, Tom FG DAC tjoyce@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 3881530
Lewis, Hugh PBP x hlewis@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814523
Marren, Donal FG x dmarren@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 6078195
McCarthy, Lettie LAB DAC x lmccarthy@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 8186718
Murphy, Tom FF DAC tmurphy@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814515
O’Callaghan, Denis LAB x denisoc@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 2785609
O’Dea, Jim FG DAC x jimodea@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 087 7677722
O’Keeffe, Gearóid IND DAC gokeefe@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 8186727
Richmond, Neale FG DAC ? nrichmond@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814514
Saul, Barry FG DAC bsaul@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 7814517
Smyth, Carrie LAB x carriesmyth@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 3835051
Stewart, Patricia FG pstewart@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 086 8291002
Ward, Barry FG ? bward@cllr.dlrcoco.ie 085 1578000

featured image
View from Ballinteer of Ticknock and Location of 'Retirement' Village and View that will be ruined by developers

author by Tpublication date Mon Dec 03, 2012 15:17author address author phone Report this post to the editors

This is an outrageous development and it is absolutely crazy to build a retirement home up the hills. It is totally unsuitable to OAPs and they would be 100% car dependent when they would be at an age where they can no longer drive. It is a very steep climb even for a young person to cover but for an OAP it is out of the question.

This is just blatant corruption and as the author suggests it seems designed and indeed will open up the entire mountain side to development. The real plan is most likely to then build exclusive homes with city views to cater for the 1% whose wealth incidentally has gone up in the recession/depression while everyone's else has done down.

author by Katepublication date Fri Dec 07, 2012 01:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I agree we ve just had a dreadful budget and now they re back rezoning. Have they learn't nothing. However, it ll be a lovely monument to FG and FF least we forget that nothing has changed. I live locally and everyone is talking about it. We re in sheer disbelief.

author by destorying our enviornmentpublication date Mon Dec 10, 2012 19:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I have seen mad re zoning plans near to where i live, on wet lands,flood planes,do you think the people who bought those houses stupidy are entiteled to insurance when they flood every year?

author by hell fire clubpublication date Mon Dec 10, 2012 23:03author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Word in at pm to say the rezoning was defeated - in other words some of the councillors who had voted for it at a preliminary stage now voted against it. A result for people power I'd say.

author by so it goespublication date Tue Dec 11, 2012 23:15author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It turns out that there was a break called in which a lot of huddling took place, following which it was agreed without a vote to accept the manager's advice. In other words those councillors who had made promises (for whatever reason) to the developers as to the way they would vote could avoid exposing themselves without actually going against what they had promised. An Irish solution to an Irish problem so to speak...

Related Link: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/1211/1224327731820.html
author by Des - Nonepublication date Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:15author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Excellent article, one that has had some part in the 'proposal' being defeated.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy