Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Met Police Commissioner: ?Non-Crime Hate Incidents Are Poor Policy? Sun Jul 06, 2025 19:00 | Richard Eldred Sir Mark Rowley has called for scrapping Britain's 43 police forces in favour of 12 'mega forces' in the biggest shake-up in 60 years ? arguing officers must focus on crime, not chasing non-crime hate incidents.
The post Met Police Commissioner: ?Non-Crime Hate Incidents Are Poor Policy? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
This Is How Mass Migration Will Change Britain Beyond Recognition Sun Jul 06, 2025 17:00 | Richard Eldred Mass immigration is ripping Britain apart, warns Matt Goodwin in the Telegraph; it's set to reduce white Britons to a minority by 2063 and is unleashing a cultural breakdown that our political class refuse to confront.
The post This Is How Mass Migration Will Change Britain Beyond Recognition appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Deeply Troubling? UK Muslim Matchmaking Site Advertises Virgin Brides and Polygamous Marriages Sun Jul 06, 2025 15:00 | Richard Eldred A UK-based Muslim matchmaking site promoting virgin brides, polygamy and wife-beating advice has sparked outrage over its "deeply troubling" content.
The post ?Deeply Troubling? UK Muslim Matchmaking Site Advertises Virgin Brides and Polygamous Marriages appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Angela Rayner to Put ?Banter Police? in Your Office Sun Jul 06, 2025 13:00 | Richard Eldred Angela Rayner has been accused of plotting to spy on workplace banter by deploying 'diversity officers' ? paid for by firms ? to eavesdrop and police overheard chats.
The post Angela Rayner to Put ?Banter Police? in Your Office appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Trans Pedestrian Crossing Prompts Lawsuit Against Labour-Led Council Sun Jul 06, 2025 11:00 | Richard Eldred A trans flag pedestrian crossing funded by Labour-run Camden Council is at the centre of a lawsuit, with critics calling it unlawful political propaganda paid for by the public purse.
The post Trans Pedestrian Crossing Prompts Lawsuit Against Labour-Led Council appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
No Country for Pregnant Women
international |
rights, freedoms and repression |
press release
Tuesday March 12, 2013 10:00 by AIMS Ireland - Assoc. for Improvements in Maternity Services Ireland pr at aimsireland dot com

This past weekend, as the nation celebrated International Women’s Day and Mother’s Day, an Irish Maternity Hospital initiated an invasive procedure on a pregnant woman against her will. ‘Mother A’ was denied patient autonomy and the right to informed refusal when the drastic and unprecedented measure of an emergency High Court sitting was called in order to compel her to undergo a Caesarian section. The risk of uterine rupture was cited as one of the main reasons for the urgency in this case but this risk is widely reported as being 0.1% or 1/1000. This is what Dr. Michael Turner, Obstetrician at the Coombe Hospital has called: “exaggerated, professional scaremongering...and it must stop”. (VBAC Conference, 2012) This past weekend, as the nation celebrated International Women’s Day and Mother’s Day, an Irish Maternity Hospital initiated an invasive procedure on a pregnant woman against her will. ‘Mother A’ was denied patient autonomy and the right to informed refusal when the drastic and unprecedented measure of an emergency High Court sitting was called in order to compel her to undergo a Caesarian section. The risk of uterine rupture was cited as one of the main reasons for the urgency in this case but this risk is widely reported as being 0.1% or 1/1000. This is what Dr. Michael Turner, Obstetrician at the Coombe Hospital has called: “exaggerated, professional scaremongering...and it must stop”. (VBAC Conference, 2012)
State-sanctioned coercion of medical procedures on pregnant women or any other competent adult is not only unacceptable but it is also unlawful in other jurisdictions, such as the USA and the UK (Re AC [1990] & Re S [1998]). ‘Informed consent’ and ‘informed refusal’ abuses are common issues reported to AIMS Ireland by women.
Jene Kelly of AIMS Ireland states: “there is an overwhelming acceptance by the public and some maternity service providers in Ireland that a pregnant woman’s right to informed consent, or informed refusal, is not reliable and that women who exert their rights are selfish. It is this mentality that has allowed atrocities such as symphysiotomies, miscarriage misdiagnoses, unnecessary hysterectomies by Dr Neary and all the other reported assaults against women by our maternity system to continue to go unanswered in Ireland for so long. This is no country for pregnant women. ”
AIMS Ireland reports that women who are bullied into consenting do not fulfill the principles of informed consent and therefore are entitled to sue the doctors for assault. For example, a woman who was forced to have a caesarean section against her wishes in the UK sued the doctors (Ms S v St George's NHS Hospital Trust, 1998) and was awarded £36,000 damages. It is time that Irish women did the same. Threatening women, bringing women to the high court, removing women’s rights and choices - these bullyboy tactics do not promote trust between women and their care providers. How can you trust a system that doesn’t acknowledge your rights? Women are choosing to leave the system as a result.
Annette is one of these women. She is lobbying the HSE for a homebirth following a previous Caesarean section. The HSE currently does not recognize informed choice for homebirth for women who fall outside strict exclusion criteria in site of a European Court of Human Rights ruling recognizing a woman’s right to decide how and where she births. Annette does not meet criteria following her previous Caesarean, despite having subsequent successful vaginal births. Annette asks: “Is it HSE policy to use the High Court as a method of intimidation and coercion, when a patient tries to exercise her right to informed decision making, as laid out by the European Court of Human Rights (Ternovsky v Hungary, Under Article 8)? We are humans, with great intellect. We are capable of informed discussion and decisions regarding our pregnancies and births in the best interests of ourselves, our babies and our families. I feel anger, disappointment and bewilderment. Today as a woman and mother, I grieve.”
###
|