Upcoming Events

National | Consumer Issues

no events match your query!

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Britain ?To Lose a Pub a Day? as Labour?s Tax Raid Bites Thu Jul 10, 2025 19:30 | Will Jones
One pub will close every day this year as Labour?s tax raid makes it "impossible to make a profit", with 33% of sales revenue now going to the taxman, the British Beer and Pub Association has warned.
The post Britain “To Lose a Pub a Day” as Labour’s Tax Raid Bites appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The French Handed the Migrants Over ? Then Asked for Their Life Jackets Back Thu Jul 10, 2025 17:56 | Will Jones
On the day Starmer and Macron announce their 'migrant deal', Nigel Farage is in the Channel to witness the French handing 78 migrants over to the British ? though not before asking for their life jackets back.
The post The French Handed the Migrants Over ? Then Asked for Their Life Jackets Back appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link No, 170 Londoners Didn?t ?Die of Climate Change? Last Week Thu Jul 10, 2025 15:38 | Will Jones
According to Imperial College and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 170 Londoners died due to climate change in last week's heatwave. But it's just more modelling make believe, says Ross Clark.
The post No, 170 Londoners Didn’t “Die of Climate Change” Last Week appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Schools Ban Children From Playing Outside During Heatwaves Thu Jul 10, 2025 13:05 | Will Jones
Schools are banning children from?playing outside during heatwaves, keeping them inside for 'hot play' breaks when their playgrounds are deemed to be 'too hot to use safely'.
The post Schools Ban Children From Playing Outside During Heatwaves appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Why are Taxpayers Being Charged ?1.2 Million for ?Inclusive? GCSE History? Thu Jul 10, 2025 11:00 | Charlotte Gill
Taxpayers have been charged ?1.2m for a project to make GCSE history 'inclusive'. Charlotte Gill takes a look at who's behind it and finds a bunch of uber-woke organisations pushing the usual gender and race gobbledegook.
The post Why are Taxpayers Being Charged ?1.2 Million for ‘Inclusive’ GCSE History? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en

offsite link Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en

offsite link The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Support Corporate Crime

category national | consumer issues | opinion/analysis author Tuesday March 30, 2004 02:54author by Watchdog Report this post to the editors

Oppose use of natural plants.

As the Prohibition of Marijuana was done for the benefit of health-damaging industries like logging, pulp, chlorine, pesticides, petrochemical plastics, big pharma and the like, so too is the virtually inevitable Prohibition of Tobacco. Those who like the idea of another Prohibition, please step to the front of the "anti-smoking" crusade.

This will be to just ask some questions.

* Why do those who elsewhere fight the harms of pesticide and other chemical industries IGNORE those same industries, even the same specific firms, for their part in cigarettes? Pub proprietors will be fined, arrested, and put out of business for allowing "smoking", but Dow, DuPont, BASF, Uniroyal, Shell, and the rest won't even be embarrassed for their KNOWN toxic/carcinogenic, and unlisted cigarette adulterants.

* In Ireland, have gov't officials who work for the Smoke Ban been checked to see if they are economically linked to parts of the cig industry that dearly hope to remain Out Of The Picture? This refers to oil/pharm firms that make tobacco pesticides, chlorine firms that supply the materials for pesticides and the cig paper bleach, paper firms that supply the bleached paper, ag biz firms that supply so many non-tobacco cig additives, and so forth. If they were economically linked to Insurance Firms that have investment holdings in cigs and cig suppliers, would that be acceptable as they work to pass blame and burdens of law onto Publicans and their customers?

* If health is the issue (as they say), why aren't the KNOWN health damaging non-tobacco parts of typical cigs Long GONE? They aren't even mentioned.

* Ireland signed the POPs Treaty...to globally eliminate chlorine's by-product, dioxin (and 11 of the other top worst industrial pollutants). Why then is dioxin STILL allowed in cigarette smoke due to the CONTINUED tolerance of chlorine cig contaminants?

* If Dioxin is so bad, why is there no Warning Label about it on cig packages? (We know why. It would indict those who LET it be there.)

* It's said that "tobacco smoke" is harmful. How then is it that NO STUDIES of tobacco smoke (as opposed to ADULTERATED tobacco smoke) have been presented?

* Has anyone noticed that the word "smoking" puts blame on the victims, the ones doing the smoking...and that it IGNORES Manufacturing Processes, where the untested and known deadly stuff is made into an undefined, unlabeled "cigarette"?

* Has anyone noticed that the well-known effects of dioxin are virtually IDENTICAL to what are called (by corporate entities) "smoking-related illnesses". Has anyone noticed that NO PLANT, tobacco or other, is capable of such effects? Why, then, is tobacco the focus? Rhetorical question.

* Do we WANT another Prohibition of yet another natural, smokeable, traditionally-used public domain plant?

* Why does the World Trade Org. push for smoke bans? It does NOT push for getting the known deadly industrial stuff OUT of cigarettes, nor does it even call for listing of these things. And, of course, it doesn't ask that a single unwitting, unprotected, insufficiently-warned consumer be compensated.

* And...is a side-"benefit" here something about reducing Pub patronage?...a stealth war on alcohol...an echo of a former, ill-fated Prohibition. Has Talibanism become a global plague?

* Do folks believe that the Corporatocracy cares about ANYONE's health? Pub workers respiratory health seems to be more of an urgent issue than the LIVES of untold thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis and so forth.

* Is it not interesting that OTHER work-place dangers are not included in this "clean air" program? How can a law be legitimate unless the other things are eliminated too? What about auto-exhaust in shops and parking garages, welding fumes, copy-machine fumes, paints/solvents/varnishes/ lacquers/disinfectants/pesticides...and etc?
What about candles, cooking smoke and CHURCH INCENSE?

Save an altar boy. Say NO to Incense!

Related Link: http://www.ktc.com/~bdrake

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   .     Up in smoke    Tue Mar 30, 2004 10:54 
   Clarification...     Watchdog    Wed Mar 31, 2004 00:10 
   all very well     Badman    Wed Mar 31, 2004 00:36 
   Natural risks vs. Corporate crime     Watchdog    Wed Apr 21, 2004 03:57 


 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy