North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Trump hosts former head of Syrian Al-Qaeda Al-Jolani to the White House Tue Nov 11, 2025 22:01 | imc
Rip The Chicken Tree - 1800s - 2025 Tue Nov 04, 2025 03:40 | Mark
Study of 1.7 Million Children: Heart Damage Only Found in Covid-Vaxxed Kids Sat Nov 01, 2025 00:44 | imc
The Golden Haro Fri Oct 31, 2025 12:39 | Paul Ryan
Top Scientists Confirm Covid Shots Cause Heart Attacks in Children Sun Oct 05, 2025 21:31 | imc
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Time for Taylor Swift to Take Up a Vegas Residency Tue Nov 18, 2025 07:00 | James Alexander
Taylor Swift has produced an album so bad it's making everyone notice how bad the other ones are. It only goes to show, says Prof James Alexander, that no one remains of interest musically once they hit 30.
The post Time for Taylor Swift to Take Up a Vegas Residency appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue Nov 18, 2025 01:47 | Jonathan Barr
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Doomed Attempt to Create Academic Journals That Nobody Pays For Mon Nov 17, 2025 19:46 | Dr Roger Watson
Is the academic publishing industry facing ruin from open access journals? Not likely, says Prof Roger Watson. There are some pretty fundamental problems with trying to run a journal that nobody pays for.
The post The Doomed Attempt to Create Academic Journals That Nobody Pays For appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
How I Found Myself in the Middle of ?Anti-Fascist? Violence at UC Berkeley Mon Nov 17, 2025 17:14 | Andrew Doyle
Andrew Doyle was warned there would be trouble when he appeared at UC Berkeley for what was intended to be the final stop on Charlie Kirk's tour. Sure enough, he soon found himself in the middle of 'anti-fascist' violence.
The post How I Found Myself in the Middle of ‘Anti-Fascist’ Violence at UC Berkeley appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Science Career Bias Against Women Debunked After Study is Repeated Mon Nov 17, 2025 15:12 | Will Jones
A landmark study that claimed men enjoy an unfair advantage in scientific careers has been debunked after a nearly identical rerun of the experiment finds the opposite is true: it's women who have the unfair advantage.
The post Science Career Bias Against Women Debunked After Study is Repeated appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3keep supporting the body shop, let's show these big companies that there is a huge market out there for cruelty free. i just found this on some website by peta
Recently, two pioneering makers of cruelty-free products—The Body Shop and Tom's of Maine—were acquired by large multinational companies—L'Oréal and Colgate, respectively. Caring consumers can send a message to the larger companies that cruelty-free products are good for business by continuing to buy The Body Shop and Tom's of Maine products—both companies have pledged to keep their strong policies against testing on animals.
PETA has a written communication from The Body Shop assuring us that the company's no-animal-tests policy will not change and that all its products will remain cruelty-free, and in a written statement, Tom's of Maine founders Tom and Kate Chappell assured customers, "You will continue to be able to rely on our tried and true Natural Care products based on our model of stewardship and sustainability. We will continue to make products without artificial preservatives, sweeteners, or dyes and without animal testing or animal ingredients."
Show Big Business That Buyers Want Compassion Across the Board
Invariably, when massive corporations buy smaller, more compassionate companies, the big companies learn from the smaller companies' success that consumers are concerned about things such as animal testing and cruelty to farmed animals. For example, Boca Foods, maker of vegetarian burgers and other vegetarian products, is now owned by hot dog giant Oscar Mayer; ConAgra owns faux-meat maker LightLife; and Dean Foods, the largest dairy products company in the world, owns White Wave, the maker of Silk soy milk and other nondairy products. These conglomerates' purchases of compassionate companies have caused humane products to become more widely promoted and sold than ever before. Mainstream America sees them and hears about them, which enables them to become more popular. Rather than turning our backs on trusted companies that are looking to expand their businesses and make their products available to caring customers everywhere, it is important that we continue to support these companies, which have rejected animal testing from the get-go.
Large corporations now recognize the expanding market of compassionate consumers who want cruelty-free food, cosmetics, and clothing. We're hopeful that the strong no-animal-testing policies of The Body Shop and Tom's of Maine will persuade Colgate and L'Oréal to permanently abandon animal tests once and for all.
What You Can Do
Please ask Colgate and L'Oréal to adopt the same compassionate standards as Tom's of Maine and The Body Shop:
Colgate-Palmolive Company
300 Park Ave.
New York, NY 10022
212-310-2000
212-310-2475 (fax)
Web form
L'Oréal USA, Inc.
575 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10017
212-818-1500
212-984-4999 (fax)
Web form
I think that georginas comments are very niave opinion and I do not believe that L'Oreal will ever change their policies, for a company so big into getting more and more chemicals on the market and making more and more money how could they ever care about compassion? They, like so many other large animal testing companies are driven by profit and profit alone, they have no concern for animals. They are so sick they even used a rabbit in one of their ads and they blind rabbits for their products. I do not believe they will all of a sudden develop a conscience or compassion. They will simply 'swallow up' the body shop and the rumour mill (and yes I know they are rumours and we will all have to wait and see) is already predicting nasty things from the body shop courtesy of L'Oreal. Also consumers who continue to support the body shop are in effect giving their money to L'Oreal who in turn will pump it into vivisection as this is what they do. I would not buy from the body shop as I dont want my money in L'Oreals pocket to maim animals so they can produce 4,000 new chemicals a year, imagine how many animals they will maim and kill for those 4,000 chemicals?
As for colgate? Dogs dont use toothpaste, colgate experiments involve debarking dogs (so they dont bark and bother the poor vivisectors) and testing their disgusting tootpaste for breath freshness on the same dogs. How sick is that? You reckon they will change their policies? I dont think so. These companies have one thing in common and this is a very important factor in all this will they wont they change their policies question. The public dont know what goes on in these labs, the public dont know much if anything about animal tested products and they are all out there in their masses buying their toothpaste (which nobody would ever imagine was tested on dogs) and theyre shampoos (which people dont generally imagine involved blinding rabbits) and they just have no idea, no notion and as long as they continue to be naive they will continue to buy products from these companies. So why would these companies all of a sudden change their policy when animal testing is the quickest, easiest and most convenient way of getting new products out on the market and of course avoiding getting sued when somebody gets shampoo in their eye and has a bad reaction? When they put on the label harmful if swallowed or inhaled for example on a bottle of bleach it is because they have force fed the bleach to pups for example inside huntingdon life sciences (http://www.shac.net) so if a person swallows some bleach that person cannot sue them because they can say well we put it on the bottle and told you not to swallow it. The data collected from these experiments does nothing to help the person who has consumed the bleach as doctors in hospitals dont actually use the data from the animal experiments and instead go back through data from when people swallowed it. The same rule applies to any product containing chemicals (for which L'Oreal are notorious).
Dont be niave about these companies they care about profits, profits and more profits and they will never change their policies to not using chemicals in their products. Colgate (along with most toothpastes found in the supermarket) contains flouride which is a chemical and is being linked to numerous illnesses including hip fracture, cancer, and intellectual impairment - (http://www.fluoridation.com/calgaryh.htm)
Ask Jeeves - what is flouride
[Web Answer]
Flouride is a highly-toxic substance that can accumulate in the body and cause a variety of diseases.
Im afraid Toms of maine and the body shop will be swept away in the race to get as many products on the market in as short a time as possible and their own compassionate policies will be changed and even if they dont (which I dont believe is possible) their profits will still go to the companies who now own them and THEIR policies will never change as long as the general public remains naive as to what exactly they are buying. These companies will do anything to give themselves a clean and friendly image (like L'Oreal using a rabbit in an ad) and of coures NEVER let the public know how they get their products on the market in the first place and until laws change and public awareness changes it will continue in the same manner it always has and yes people want cruelty free - trouble is they dont know that the vast majority of products they are buying are NOT cruelty free. They dont know their shampoo, soap, deodorant, toothpaste, makeup, skin care etc etc etc are all animal tested (http://www.networkorganic.com/subsite/download.aspx?n=s...oding) by most of the large companies (http://www.buav.org).
MOST PEOPLE DONT EVEN OWN A CRUELTY FREE SHOPPING GUIDE (I recommend the shac one myself)
(http://www.navs.org) (http://www.irishantivivisection.org)
Compassionate shopping needn't be difficult when you know which companies do have humane policies and which don't.
For a really easy to follow and comprehensive guide to personal and household cleaning products which don't neccesitate further animal suffering, I've found Naturewatch's Compassionate Shopping Guide is a must have. It's 80 pages long, packed full of information and only £2.50