Upcoming Events

National | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.  We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below). 

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

David Begg calls for nuclear power

category national | environment | news report author Thursday March 22, 2007 16:58author by SP Member - Socialist Party/CWI Report this post to the editors

The Irish Congress of Trade Unions has called for a national debate on nuclear power as a way of providing enough energy for Ireland's growing population.

Speaking at the launch of a congress policy document on sustainable energy, General Secretary David Begg said that he was not 'cheerleading' for nuclear power.

However, he said that within five years it must be acknowledged that some energy imported from the UK would undoubtedly be generated by nuclear means.

He accused the Government of a lack of 'joined-up thinking' in its formulation of energy policy.

Congress has also called for the establishment of a National Energy Agency.

It said the energy issue is too serious to be left in the hands of politicians engaging in 'electoral gimmickry'.

http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0322/energy.html

How low can Begg actually go?????

author by C.Murraypublication date Thu Mar 22, 2007 19:19author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Afterall the unions form part of the IBEC inspired tri-partite much copied
PPP process- its ok really to 'lead' people toward nuclear power David, afterall
the other members of the tri-partite- the State and IBEC have perverted the
mandate for long enough with the support and co-operation of the non-representative
unions.

btw: The lawyers employed in writing the SIB heads (bill introduced to the Dail
to faciltate corrupt and unmandated planning abuse ) are the self-same lawyers
who represent the corporations- and you cannot get cosier than that.

The unions involved in the tri-partite PPP and government negotiation
sold out a long time ago- the 'Race to the top" mentality has fueled amongst
other things:- Labour's move to centrism. the establishment who are responsible
for the gross abuse of the health service, the growth of the PD's
and the use of the PPP in other EU states to break unions.

Communities know that the unions are about wealth and that the SIB
is about destruction- only problem is the gap caused by the sell out
is not yet filled. Next time you see Pat Rabbitte in the Dail taking a strip
of the PD's , remeber that it's political theatre.

Labour' faciltated the lack of speaking time in the Dail- giving the Taoiseach friday off.
'Labour' wants to go into power with an avowed right-wing party.
'Labour' accept the growth of private hospitals and supports universal health insurance.
'Labour' and FG has two leaders form Mayo who have turned their backs on the
Rossport and Erris community.

SIB allows for nuclear power in Ireland. it is being investigated by Marine
and Natural Resources in committee.There has been no effective opposition in this country
for many years. FF must be rubbing their hands in glee.

author by News listenerpublication date Thu Mar 22, 2007 23:03author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Isn't the headline for this thread missing the words 'debate on'. Or is the sp school of falsification allowed now on imc. Beggs called for a debate on nuclear power. He didn't call for nuclear power. I know debate isn't popular in Leninist groups but like it or not one is needed.

author by SP Member - Socialist Party/CWIpublication date Thu Mar 22, 2007 23:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

unless he supported the idea. The only people who call for a 'debate' are people who want to see a change in the current situation where we do not have nuclear power. Besides Begg is a calculating b**tard and doesn't say anything off the cuff. He is clearly flying a kit for his buddies in social partnership as Ahern does not want to take the political flak for suggesting it himself. If you think any different you are living in cloud cuckoo land!

author by Joe McCarthypublication date Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Nice little exercise in slimy redbaiting there. It's ok for David Beggs to "call for a debate" on nuclear power (in other words, he thinks nuclear power is a good thing, as SP member above points out), but when a member of the Socialist Party points this out, we get the usual shrieking about Leninism and the "SP school of falsification" (maybe "news listener" is smart enough to know he's taking that phrase from a book by the SP's hero Trotsky). Meanwhile, not so much as a sniff of a genuine argument about the substantive issue. Why am I not surprised?

author by C Murraypublication date Sun Mar 25, 2007 14:31author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Michael Ryan wants nuclear power, jayzhus we'd better get it- he might take an ad out in one
of Tony O Reilly's rags otherwise.

author by c murraypublication date Sun Mar 25, 2007 16:36author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Michael (Ryan air) O leary wants nuke power in Ireland.
I mistakenly wrote Michael Ryan;- everyone is reacting to the lightbulb and
toxic emmission speech made by Bertie in his corrupt little nod to the
green issues facing the next generation of Irish kids.

Bertie did not mention the re-cycled toilet-paper or the bigger faster cars
and the toll roads- nope, he wants to make the State use energy efficent light
bulbs and offset toxic government jet emmissions by contributing to green
projects. He may even romance Sargent in his attempt to get a third term. FF
are sending candidates to our doorsteps with a green- consciousness
and awareness- so we can have a bit of fun with them on the list:-

!.Rossport.
!Tara.
!S.I.B (allows nuclear power)
The closure for profit of the Ringsend glass re-cycling plant.
fast-track corporate lovieness by creating the PPP and SIb which reduces
citizen rights to protest through the judicial system.
encouraging conspicuous consumption.
Oh the list goes on and on.

The Ryan debacle is in the Sunday Independent and is a lon on/register dealy.

author by The Scarlet Pimpernelpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 09:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Beggs is so in tune with the state that this is what the state did yesterday:
Ireland has joined three northern European countries to launch an international campaign against the use of nuclear energy as a solution to climate change.
The group, which includes Norway, Iceland and Austria, has also called for an independent international safety review to be carried out on the controversial Thorp nuclear processing plant at Sellafield, which has been closed for nearly two years following the discovery of a large leak of nuclear waste.
Environment ministers of all four countries met in Dublin on Sunday and yesterday morning for talks amid a growing debate in Europe on the role of nuclear energy. In a joint statement yesterday they described nuclear energy as "economically and environmentally untenable".
The statement said: "We voice serious concern that nuclear energy is being presented as a solution to climate change. It is our collective view that the current debate seeks to downplay the environmental, waste, proliferation, nuclear liability and safety issues and seeks to portray nuclear energy as a clean, safe and problem-free response to climate change".
It said that the "inherent risks and problems" of nuclear energy remained.

author by C Murraypublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:32author address author phone Report this post to the editors

They really should tell the media who are largely co-opted by the vested interests.
The first sign on the issue was the Oireachtas committee, followed by the Newstalk
interviews (about depleted uranium).

Political campaigns begin through the vested interests and if the current government
who do not appear to read their own legislation do not do it, then the next one will.

The SIB allows a global corporation to apply to put anything they want in Ireland.
The tri-partite PPP facilitates that.
The courts are to be re-structured to facilitate fast-track planning.
The citizen's right to object has been reduced through the present government's
use of 'elements of Aaarhus' which give the right to object alone to incepted
and recognised environmental groups, with 12 months inception and the
premise of environmental preservation in it's title and aims.

Meaning ad hoc protest groups are not to be recognised by the courts- of which there will
now be a specific planning division. the Bill was moved through the house on the
16th of June 06.The lawyers have links to the legal application of the SIB on their
sites to aid corporate understanding of legislation- maybe the Taoiseach should read
it. .............

Roche introduced the Bill on the 16th feburary 06- he was asked by the media at the launch
if it were to include incinerators and gas pipelines- yes- except Poolbeg.
and it will also include communications infrastructure.

I asked Roche why there was no separate Bill to legislate for protection of heritage
to which he responded: " Good question, not in this Government's lifetime'

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy