The end of oil. The Celtic Oil Dragon

national | anti-capitalism | opinion/analysis

Tuesday June 19, 2007 11:34

by paul o toole

RTE(Refuse to Tell the Electorate ) do it again

RTE, renouned for steralising any event or occurence to save our delicate constitutions from even minimal shock, ran a programme last night at 9.30. The subject-Peak-Oil.

As a thought provoking piece of entertainment the show was adequate. As a rounded piece of analysis it failed miserably- as do all of RTE's productions. RTE's mandate to the public is to inform, the freedom of the press is supposed to ensure this. RTE's licence is granted under this and many other caviats but as the main National Media Provider it follows government policy rather than lead a free press.
Because Few people in Celtic Tiger Ireland care to know about the bloodshed that our government are participating in, does not mean RTE should shield us from that reality, after all, that bloodshed is what is sustaining our economic growth and dont be fooled, but RTE will never tell you this

While the show did verge on showing the certain reality facing us all when the global economy collapses due to the rationing of the one thing which made it all possible. And it did offer some alternatives, none of which have any basis in a future reality, it also exposed Irelands vunerability to certain crash when oil does 'peak'.
We have moved from the 1920's when oil was our slave to now when oil is our master. RTE has given us all something to entertain our selves with, occupy our minds with, and discuss at coffee breaks and lunches for those so inclined.
What RTE failed to do is to look at the politics behind oil consumption, the politics behind the 'free' market economy, the politics behind globalisation and the politics which no one wants to ever see at all-especially RTE and its viewers-the real cost of oil.
When oil was at 50 usd a barrel in 2002 Bush said it would come down to35 dollars a barrel after he 'liberated' Iraq, it's now at 80 dollars a barrel- and it wont be comming down.
The five major oil Corporations are a huge lobby in Washington, not that you need to lobby washington given the Bush/Cheney connections and business dealings to the Saudi Oil/Royal family, but because the West needs oil and most of it is in the East.
What RTE diddnt say is that 50% of working class Americans taxes go directly on military spending. The politicians send the military to war in order to secure this oil by creating pretexts to justify the attack, the corporations move in and stick their label on the barrels and sell it back to us and we buy it. The funny thing is that the oil companies-the richest businesses on the planet-never pay for the oil, they steal it. The whole game is basically armed robbery. Not only do ordinary people pay with cash for this oil, they pay with their lives. American and British soldiers fighting with their lives, so as oil companies can get the resource and sell it back to ordinary people. Not to mention the millions of innocent people killed in the Middle East, the latest figures form Iraq stand at 750,000, 265,000 were kids. There is massive criminality involved and it starts at the top.
Irelands role in this criminality is to participate by allowing Shannon to be used in the invasion of Iraq and continnue it's occupation. The blood will continnue to flow, probably even more-so when the global economy goes into decline. Mabey the end of oil will be a good thing for us, For Iraq, I'm sure it will, but how many will we have killed by then.

save preference

Comments (8 of 8)

Adequate analysis

by Terence

Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:50

The RTE programme last night did a fine job given they had only one hour. They presented the facts clearly and the consequences and options.

The analysis presented above, firstly starts off with a misleading title, as there is no Celtic oil as such and then the analysis is rambling and confusing, going off in multiple tangents with no clear point being made. It is quite ironic that the author slags off George Lee/RTE for an inadequate analysis when what is presented here is just that.

believe all you read

Tue Jun 19, 2007 13:19

Terrence, there is nothing misleading about stating that tie Irish economy is built on bloodshed as clearly pointed out in the opinion on top, and there is nothing misleading about saying that the Irish government supports this bloodletting to sustain our economy as pointed out clearly also. If you dont get this I'm truly sorry...for you. The other point is , is that RTE always support government policy and not a balanced reportage regime, or a free press. Sorry to have to break this to you.

Re: believe all you read

Tue Jun 19, 2007 19:27

Paul, because I thought the RTE programme was very good last night does not automatically mean that I think that RTE is normally balanced nor does it imply that I don't think they are biased on other things.

As regards 'misleading', I was referring to the title, because of the words 'Celtic Oil Dragon'. I am well aware of the politics of oil and all the rest. What I found unconvincing about your analysis is that you slag off the programme. The programme was advertised as being about Peak Oil and its relation to Ireland and the effects, not about Oil, Politics and Ireland. That would take a separate program. So you seem to have got off on the wrong point.

Also the programme was geared towards people who are unaware of peak oil and obviously hadn't thought through how dependent our entire economy (and all economies) is on cheap oil. The programme made these points very clear. And then the programme went on to indicate what would happen if this oil becomes more scare and expensive.

If you want to explain to people the politics around oil, then it is a good idea to indicate to them how central and important it is, in their lives, otherwise they won't see the full relevance of what you say. It is one thing to write an article on Indymedia where people tend to be much more informed on these sort of issues, but that is not what you wrote. Your article starts off by criticising last nights programme and then you give several paragraphs of what it should have said.

I think you have simply rushed out your article without actually considering what points you actually wanted to make, to whom, against whom and to what particular audience as well as missing the objectives and goals of the programme last night.

if 50%

by Aint true

Tue Jun 19, 2007 21:56

of the US taxes went on military spending.The US would have been able to flatten Iraq,N Korea,,Iran,China and Afghanistan in one fell swoop!Maybe that is why RTE didnt mention it????
The US NEVER even ww2 spent that much on it's military.Somthing like GDP of 40% at the height of ww2

Second why would they bother with this nonsenseical idea of invading Iraq for oil???
Iraq is about force projection in the Middle east.Look where it is located! I t borders on six countries ,two of them pretty hostile to the US.So the idea is do you want to muck with a giant US military base[Iraq] on your doorstep,or thats the simplified thinking anyway.

The Saudis and the US are locked in a death grip on each other .The Saudis need the US to survive in their corrupt country.The US gets oil from them at a std OPEC price.The Saudis and OPEC are bankrupt with foriegn credit so they need oil to stay around 25/35 dollars a barrel. The main thing the mediaand everyone else fails to mention when they blather on about 100 dollars a barrel is that is when it leaves the refinery!!! [After it has been taxed to Hell,usually by socialistic and green govts]Not coming out of the ground!!There it literally still costs 5 dollars a barrel.
Any oil coming from Iraq is just a so so bonus.
If you want to discuss peak oil fine,but quit dragging nonsenseical anti American politics into it.

Terence...

by wageslave

Wed Jun 20, 2007 03:24

If you thought this was balanced, good and informative, how come, despite mentioning how gas dependent we were, it didn't mention anything about our own gas resources at all?

stick to the topic

Wed Jun 20, 2007 08:26

If you want to discuss the 'cost' of oil then discuss the 'cost' of oil. The 'price' of oli was mentioned every two minutes on thr RTE programme. Would you listen to a sports reporter who constantly leaves out the score of the fixtures he is commenting on. Mabey you would.
If you dont see the significance of counting in the very real costs of oil in human terms, and you think RTE should not report this either, then I must say thank you.....you couldent have made my point any clearer. Thank you again

Attitude

Wed Jun 20, 2007 09:30

Dont know if youve been watching the news, Iraq and Afghanistan are flattened to the ground. Iran is probably next, as war can now be declared by the US President if he declares a state of emergency and suspends the institutions of democracy which he can now do through Executive Orders by legislation passed in the senate last week.

But please dont trot out Harneys, Berties, Cowens, Waters and Meyers rhetoric by calling me Anti-American, they've already worn that one out, and if you follow the polls, it is you are anti-american.
So, attitude, do you agree then with RTEs presentation?

Re: Attitude

Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:04

Who are you addressing this comment to? It seems quite off topic.

Number of comments per page

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Lockdown Skeptics

The end of oil. The Celtic Oil Dragon

Comments (8 of 8)