Israel told US it is modeling Gaza attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 22:35 Nov 05 0 comments UK Government manipulation of the BBC and social media over Covid 21:40 Sep 19 0 comments Good Riddance to Biden - Bye Bye Bidens 23:13 Apr 18 0 comments Exposed: Ireland’s Leading Far-right Politicians Unmasked… 20:58 Dec 07 0 comments The political power of Facebook 21:40 Oct 17 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireThe Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović
Human Rights in IrelandIndymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy
Lockdown Skeptics
News Round-Up Wed Jul 31, 2024 01:30 | Richard Eldred
Biden Proposes Sweeping Supreme Court Reforms as He Attacks ?Extreme? Judges Tue Jul 30, 2024 19:00 | Will Jones
Reeves Scraps Winter Fuel Payments for 10 Million Pensioners to Fund Public Sector Wage Rise Tue Jul 30, 2024 17:00 | Will Jones
A Summary of Why the Czech Republic Vaccine Data are So Devastating to the ?Safe and Effective? Narr... Tue Jul 30, 2024 15:00 | Will Jones
Keir Starmer?s Anti-Israel Policies Are Now No Different to Jeremy Corbyn?s Tue Jul 30, 2024 13:00 | Will Jones
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionNetanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en |
Socialist Alternative/CWI-USA candidate receives 6.5% in Boston Council election
international |
politics / elections |
news report
Friday November 09, 2007 20:36 by Jolly Red Giant - Socialist Party/CWI
On Tuesday, November 6th, over 6.5% of those who voted in Boston’s city council election cast their ballots for Matt Geary, the candidate of Socialist Alternative. This was in a city-wide election for City Council in which everyone in Boston could vote for up to four candidates. With each voter having up to four individual votes, 2.4 percent of all votes cast were for Matt, and this amounted to over three-thousand votes. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (10 of 10)
Jump To Comment: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1the vote was not conducted on the basis of proportional representation. 6.4% of voters used one of their four votes (in effect all 1st preferences) to vote for Matt Geary (my apologies for using the wrong name earlier). He received a total of 2.4% of all the votes cast (number of voters X 1,2,3 or 4 depending on how many they actually used).
So he got 2.4% of FIRST Preferences?
You are incorrect - 6.5% of all voters voted for Mike Geary. As each voter was entitled to four votes Mike Geary received 2.4% of all votes cast - 3,000+
As for the comparison with Dublin - a first-time standing on a clear left-wing platform in George Bush's America - I think the equivalent of 4-5,000 votes is an outstanding achievement.
It seems to me that he actually got 2.4% of the votes cast. Not 6.5% as claimed in the title. Given turnout, that less than 0.5% of those entitled to vote in Boston, about the equivalent of someone getting 4 or 5,000 votes in Dublin in the European elections.
a story s only newsworthy if it is carried on IMC?
I don't know if Socialist Alternative in Boston have any interaction with Boston IMC - but that hardly detracts from what SA in Boston have done in relation to the election campaign of Mike Geary. Surely anytime an openly socialistt candidate can pick up 6.5% of the vote in an American council election it is worth acknowledging the effort of all involved.
Maybe..........
I have a rule of thumb which seems reasonable to me. If there's a story posted on an IMC site remote from the location of the story which might be too good to be true (or the other way around) rand that far away city has its own IMC site -- I check THERE. If a story is real/newsworthy should be able to see talk about it.
So before discussing this story any further, how about checking in with Boston IMC
Try here
http://www.votegeary.com/
and here
http://www.socialistalternative.org/
This seems very impressive. Can you put up some links so we can get more information about this? Thanks.
Campaigning on the streets, we learned a lot more about Boston. We did not just learn about the electoral system; more importantly, we learned about the issues confronting communities. We found that housing was the key issue facing many communities. We also were brought closer to a community campaign fighting against Boston University’s attempt to put a very dangerous, level 4, ‘bio-terror’ laboratory in their community. We learned that the lack of a library is an issue in Chinatown, and the proliferation of condos (expensive privately owned apartments) is an issue in many communities.
Bringing socialist politics to the streets
The most important aspect of the experience we got is the fact that many young activists got daily experience explaining the ideas of socialism to working class people in an understandable way. In this way, the importance of the campaign will be seen for years to come.
What we found everywhere in Boston, throughout this campaign, is that working class people are fed up. Angry at the lack of affordable housing, sick of the war in Iraq, fed up with the cost of living in the city, infuriated every time they see more condos being built, and tired of the stories that come every week about one young person killing another on our streets.
Unfortunately, this anger leads to mixed consequences. Alienated from what was on offer from the main parties, many simply did not vote. The turnout was just 13.6%, down from 24.6% in 2003 and the lowest in decades. Anti-immigrant sentiment seems to have gathered some steam; with an outsider candidate running on an anti-immigrant platform getting around four thousand votes. This is an indication of the political polarisation, both left and right, taking place in US society. Socialists need to be bold about taking up this issue, and we made immigrant rights one of our key issues, despite the fact that undocumented immigrants cannot vote.
We distributed tens of thousands of leaflets, and well over a thousand copies of our eight-page election-edition of the ‘Boston Organizer’, our local Socialist Alternative newsletter. Every single piece of literature and election material, including our one-hundred huge red signs, prominently placed the logo of Socialist Alternative. Quite literally, we raised the banner of socialism to more people in Boston than has been done for a long time.
Many people were very impressed with the seriousness of our election campaign, and many people are interested in joining Socialist Alternative through this work. As the war in Iraq ravages on, as the housing situation deteriorates, and as the attacks on working people intensify, mass struggle is likely to pick up in the US.
When this fight intensifies, new activists will look for alternatives on the political and electoral plane. Socialist Alternative does not wish to just stand aside and comment on this process. We want local and state lists of candidates, independent of the Democrats and Republicans, who fight against rising rents, home foreclosures and the high cost of living.
We would contribute to the political struggle for working class representation whether the candidates’ list was explicitly socialist or not, while not hiding our own socialist views. With our experience in Boston, we are now better positioned to intervene in this type of development in a serious way.
In this way, even if only on a very small scale, Socialist Alternative’s campaign in Boston served many purposes. The campaign raised the basic ideas and programme of working class socialism; it was a campaign that consciously built an organisation; it helped to educate a layer of young working class activists, and it was a tiny but important step towards creating working class political representation.
well done, could you expand on what kind of outreach you engaged in as a party to raise public knowledge and his profile?