Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Trump hosts former head of Syrian Al-Qaeda Al-Jolani to the White House Tue Nov 11, 2025 22:01 | imc
Rip The Chicken Tree - 1800s - 2025 Tue Nov 04, 2025 03:40 | Mark
Study of 1.7 Million Children: Heart Damage Only Found in Covid-Vaxxed Kids Sat Nov 01, 2025 00:44 | imc
The Golden Haro Fri Oct 31, 2025 12:39 | Paul Ryan
Top Scientists Confirm Covid Shots Cause Heart Attacks in Children Sun Oct 05, 2025 21:31 | imc Human Rights in Ireland >>
The Ministry of Don?t Ask, Won?t Tell Sun Dec 21, 2025 19:26 | Clive Pinder ?Proper measurement creates accountability,? says Clive Pinder, as he calls for the Government to publish clear datasets on immigration and sexual offences. Then we can debate with facts rather than vibes.
The post The Ministry of Don’t Ask, Won’t Tell appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
From The Junction to The Sea Sun Dec 21, 2025 17:15 | Tom Forrester-Paton Sydney resident Tom Forrester-Paton reflects on the Bondi beach massacre and puts forward an eight-point action plan to combat Islamic terror and reclaim the Australia he knew in his youth.
The post From The Junction to The Sea appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Online Safety Act is Bad for Free Speech, says Substack CEO Sun Dec 21, 2025 15:10 | Jonathan Barr ?It pushes toward something much darker: a system of mass political censorship unlike anywhere else in the western world.??Substack CEO Chris Best explains why the Online Safety Act is bad news for free speech.
The post The Online Safety Act is Bad for Free Speech, says Substack CEO appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Appeasement 0, Jew Hatred 15 Sun Dec 21, 2025 13:10 | Ramesh Thakur ?Spare me the sermons on Islamophobia,? says Ramesh Thakur. ?We do need to have the difficult conversation on the numbers of immigration that is safe to protect and preserve Australia as a cohesive society.?
The post Appeasement 0, Jew Hatred 15 appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Offensive? Christmas Songs Could Fall Victim to Labour?s Banter Ban Sun Dec 21, 2025 11:14 | Jonathan Barr Festive revellers may have to be careful which tunes they pick for a Christmas sing-along down at the pub, as songs like ?Baby It?s Cold Outside?, ?Do They Know It?s Christmas??, and ?Jingle Bells? might offend the staff.
The post ‘Offensive’ Christmas Songs Could Fall Victim to Labour’s Banter Ban appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Politics: Ask any politician, "Is Black really White ?"
international |
rights, freedoms and repression |
opinion/analysis
Monday January 14, 2008 23:49 by Seamus Power. - V.L.P.S.

Ask any politician, "Is Black really White ?"
Politicians are at the forefront in creating a new world, but will they slip further into their world of power and deceit ?
In theory the judicial system and the political process operate independently of each other. In practice the lines of demarcation are often blurred and at a certain level both ideologies often merge into one.
The political process is in the hands of big business. It works to service the economic ethos of the day and does so effectively. The profit principle dominates, the democratic imperative follows. The financiers who control much of the world’s wealth set the pace. They decide policy; the politicians find ways to implement it. The world must be kept safe for those in control, long-term planning is therefore essential.
Many of the big decisions today are made in secret, the prying eye an unwelcome guest. The issues that affect people’s lives, the environment and the future matter little to the moneyed moguls. They operate behind closed doors and are not driven by human sentiment. Their objective is to garner as much power to the centre as possible; the poor and the weak further isolated. This process is called progress, it is blessed and endorsed by the political system, it is then rolled out as democracy. People buy into this illusion and the human saga continues.
The political process is a machine made up of many parts. It is global in reach and clear in purpose. It is cleverly designed, adaptable and ruthlessly efficient. It is that beast that facilitated two world wars in the last century and many others. All conflicts in fact have their origin in some political process. The philosophy underpinning big power is therefore predatory not peaceful, the instinct to control sharper than the urge to accommodate.
Wars don’t just happen, they are caused; the armaments industry prospers and the financiers pulling the strings plan the next escapade. So it is with many other things, hidden forces in the background shape events, the political process offers respectability. If it were any other way people would rebel. If they could see the enemy they would protest. In the past tyranny was opposed at every level. Today the political process camouflages the truth and politicians play a double game.
They accommodate the status quo while facilitating change, they talk idealistically yet act pragmatically, i.e., to get elected. Most of the big decisions are preordained; the rubber stamp only gives them political endorsement. Politicians know their place at the table and the limits of what they can say or do. Convention abhors a rebel and those with a restless spirit are quietly sidelined or squeezed out all together. The system is thus structured to comply with its master not to confront it. The beast that lurks in the background is exacting and cruel and its writ is sacrosanct.
Politicians serve the people and big power. In order to accommodate this contradiction they adopt different personae, a new face for every event, a mask to cloud the real intent. The facility to entertain so many opposites requires a certain mind-set, the mentality that can roll with the punches and run with events and not be perturbed: a new man so to speak. This new mind underpins the modern era; it is a vital link in the jigsaw of power.
Speaking in many tongues today the politician can rationalise the world, he can explain it but not reveal it. Hidden agendas remain in the background. Debate can centre on how things happen but not why. Peripheral issues dominate the landscape; the blueprint that decides all is never touched. The politician provides a mask, behind this industrial and economic tyranny prospers. Big power needs to camouflage reality; the politician is a ready accomplice in this deceit.
The local representative likewise plays his role. He keeps the illusion alive in town and county, the pretence that everything is as it seems. Once he sniffs the beast and where real power comes from he recoils. Better to live with things as they are than to lose everything. Very few challenge the system. Those few determined to expose everything are silenced or eliminated. It is in this fashion that the world survives as it does, unequal, unfair and unrestrained.
The media collude with the political process in preserving this charade. Newspapers do not highlight the duplicity of politicians and what is left unsaid. The electronic media is equally placid. All are in the pay of big business. The politicians can therefore play the game unhindered. Saying one thing and meaning another has now become second nature to the political class. They do so regularly and voluntarily on the airwaves, this has honed their skills not inhibited them. The masters of deceit have now become the icons of the age. History, however, will record a different verdict.
Politicians have little to fear from the institutions of the state or from the opposition. In fact all political parties sing virtually, the same tune. Big money decides the agenda, politicians vote on issues like the budget and the methods of distribution but little else. The decisions that affect the state of the world, the progress of wars, the extent of famines and the indigenous poor are made elsewhere. The democratic process gives the illusion of participation. Fewer and fewer now make decisions, all power is moving towards the centre.
The centralisation of power is the greatest threat to civilisation today. Emperors of the past saw its benefits; today politicians collude in its progress. In earlier times dictators ruled by force, at present power is acquired through consent. The citizen’s rights are being eroded the individual has little say in his future, local democracy is barely evident. The politicians elected to protect the system are supervising its decline. The emperor and his retinue are back in fashion again.
Politicians are at the forefront in creating a new world, an era of duplicity. They provide the mask behind which deceit can flourish, doublethink take precedence. Little that is said today can be taken at face value. Even the language is being rolled out as the enemy. Once black is presented as white people lose the ability to decipher what is real.
Words can mean anything; political jargon is the new tyranny of the age. The enemy can slip in the backdoor not by force but by invitation. The world can turn upside-down and be treated as normal. The politicians have acquiesced in this process; the world bequeathed to the future is their world. History will not judge them kindly.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 2 1is paralyzing any constructive actions and leading us all meekly and insanely to our own destruction
while waiting for death, you might as well watch these. the second one is even funny
The corporation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=192012118972057...dex=1
robert newmans history of oil
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-47796974961332...dex=0
Academics write the history and usually after the politicians have passed on.
So why would the politicians give a shit?