Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Sat Nov 30, 2024 01:30 | Toby Young A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Ulez Architect? and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary Fri Nov 29, 2024 17:38 | Will Jones One of the 'architects of Ulez' and a supporter of 20mph zones has been appointed as the new Transport Secretary?after Louise Haigh's resignation, raising fears the anti-car measures may become national policy.
The post ‘Ulez Architect’ and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:07 | Will Jones MPs have voted in favour of legalising assisted suicide as Labour's massive majority allowed the legislation to clear its first hurdle in the House of Commons by 330 votes to 275.
The post Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s Fri Nov 29, 2024 13:43 | Rebekah Barnett Australia is the first country to ban social media for under-16s after a landmark bill passed that critics have warned is rushed and a Trojan horse for Government Digital ID as everyone must now verify their age.
The post Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:32 | Ben Pile Is banning the burps of bullocks worth risking our bollocks? That the question posed by the decision to give Bovaer to cows to 'save the planet', says Ben Pile, after evidence suggests a possible risk to male fertility.
The post Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?110 Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:01 | en
Verbal ceasefire in Lebanon Fri Nov 29, 2024 14:52 | en
Russia Prepares to Respond to the Armageddon Wanted by the Biden Administration ... Tue Nov 26, 2024 06:56 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?109 Fri Nov 22, 2024 14:00 | en
Joe Biden and Keir Starmer authorize NATO to guide ATACMS and Storm Shadows mis... Fri Nov 22, 2024 13:41 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Open Letter: Oppose Tesco's 'Computers for Schools' Vouchers Scheme
national |
consumer issues |
opinion/analysis
Sunday March 30, 2008 13:07 by Mark C - Teacher
Below is a letter that I recently sent to about 120 newspapers. A small number have got back to me to say they are featurising the story. Others are publishing it as a letter. The Sunday Business Post got in contact to see if it was sent to anyone else (I haven't heard from them since I said it was; my personal thought it that if it's not their scoop, they're not interested). It has also been sent to Tesco (without a reply, yet!).
Feel free to copy/distribute/send to Tesco. Sir
The recently launched Tesco 'Computers for Schools' scheme claims to provide schools with free IT equipment. This is a fallacy. Simple maths will explain: in order for a school to claim a 'free' computer that retails at about 700, customers will have to spend 344,000 in Tesco (i.e. 34,400 vouchers at 10 each); in order for a school to claim a 'free' battery charger and four batteries (that you could buy for around 10) customers will be asked to add 18,900 to Tesco's bank account, and so on. (Source: 2008 Tesco Computers for Schools Catalogue, available at tesco.ie)
What a scheme like this actually does is allow an under-funded education system to continue to be under-funded by allowing the government to continue to abdicate its responsibilities in this area. The line seems to be: if Tesco are willing to provide IT equipment, why not let them? The same is true of the currently-running SuperValu 'Kids in Action' scheme, which claims to give free sports equipment to schools. These companies are simply preying on a captive audience, an audience made up of the least marketing-savvy and media-savvy conscious people in our communities - primary school kids. Could you imagine the uproar if Tesco et al decided to run a 'Medical Equipment for Hospitals' voucher scheme? Or, 'Better Equipment for the Gardaν' voucher scheme?
The only free thing that comes out of this scheme is free advertising for the supermarkets. A cursory look at Tesco's website gives the following advice to teachers to increase the amount of vouchers they collect: 'Put up posters around school' (i.e. advertise for us); 'Send a letter to parents' (i.e. advertise for us); 'Design and circulate flyers' (i.e. advertise for us); 'send a letter to other local businesses' (i.e. advertise for us); 'prize for the class who collects the most vouchers' (i.e. pit students against students).
The Irish National Teachers Organisation has called on its 34,000 members to 'reject this campaign by sending the vouchers back or by putting them in the recycle bin". Indeed, this is advice that every right thinking parent ought to consider (whilst also writing to Tesco to let them know that we are not going to allow our education system to be co-opted by private enterprise).
Is mise,
Mark C
Related Links:
Campaign for Commercial-Free Education:
http://www.commercialfreeeducation.com/
Tesco 'Computers for Schools' Website:
http://www.tesco.ie/schools/
SuperValu 'Kids in Action' Website:
http://www.supervalukidsinaction.com/
INTO Rep. says send them back or bin them:
http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0309/pobal_av.html?2347032,...l,230 - report begins at about "20 minutes"
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3Tesco's advice on when and/or where to count the vouchers:
"Why not use vouchers for counting practice in Maths classes or to keep children occupied during wet playtimes." (Of course, the silly people forgot to put a question mark at the end of that statement! I guess they're too busy studying maths and accounting to have any time for English and punctuation.) Heaven forbid students might be given games like chess or draughts or hangman during wet playtimes.
Talk about a captive audience.
Mark.
Tesco are exploiting the governments failure to fund schools properly and getting their marketing and branding claws into children at a young age.
A school in tallagh had to spend over 250,000 in tesco to get soccer balls and a mat for gym.
The parents in my kids school has to spend over 1 mil in tesco for a computer, gym equiptment and some oyher sport stuff all worth in total about e1,800.
I put the feeler out to boycott tesco on the grounds of exploitation and get them to pay up front for he stuff the school was looking for as a gift.....the response was pretty good, very good in fact. The figures speak for themselves.
Tesco is a company which dosent have to disclose how much it makes in Ireland every year??. How does the govt collect taxes.
Although I can't say I whole heartedly agree with computers for schools schemes, I have to say that your a little wrong with the flaw you've picked out. Yes a computer ends up costing an incredible amount of money in vouchers. But it's a product of money they spend anyway. It doesn't actually cost the parents, students or teachers anything to get those vouchers.
It just means that they shop at tesco rather than somewhere else. Now for someone who's living in Ireland this is a bit of an issue, because the retail sector's a big factor when you're talking about the ecconomy, but for those living in England it's not such a big deal.
The actual point you're making though, that the vouchers cost a spit load is invalid. I'd say 100 a week would be a modest guess of how much a family of 3 spend on shopping each week. Say a teacher has 120 students in a medium sized school. This would be 12,000 being spent each week. If all that was turned into computers for schools vouchers, you'd have a new computer every 3 weeks.
The point another commenter made on using chess boards is for another debate, one I'd be interested in getting involved in. But it's got nothing to do with what we're talking about here.
There's also a positive to be pointed out here. If we're skimming this cream that Tesco is offering, for shopping with them. Essentially getting investment in schools and in schools' ITC then it's adding funding that schools need, that isn't catered for adequately in most countries by the government and the budget. This funding problem risks leading schools to privatization, which any informed individual will know is definitely not what we want for schools. The idea of putting technology into a school is a good thing if you've thought about it, everyone knows what they're doing and the reason you're doing it isn't because some monster organization wants you to produce a load of students who know how to type and use spss for the next generation of accountants.
Anyway, that's about alls I have to say. I realise this is an old thread, but I'm doing research on computers in schools for my thesis and found it interesting, and figured someone might come along some day like I did and read this and find it useful.
If you want to read the latest catalogue(which was made in 2008) Its available to download in the link I've provided.
Garion.