Upcoming Events

National | EU

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link News Round-Up Sat Nov 30, 2024 01:30 | Toby Young
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link ?Ulez Architect? and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary Fri Nov 29, 2024 17:38 | Will Jones
One of the 'architects of Ulez' and a supporter of 20mph zones has been appointed as the new Transport Secretary?after Louise Haigh's resignation, raising fears the anti-car measures may become national policy.
The post ‘Ulez Architect’ and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:07 | Will Jones
MPs have voted in favour of legalising assisted suicide as Labour's massive majority allowed the legislation to clear its first hurdle in the House of Commons by 330 votes to 275.
The post Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s Fri Nov 29, 2024 13:43 | Rebekah Barnett
Australia is the first country to ban social media for under-16s after a landmark bill passed that critics have warned is rushed and a Trojan horse for Government Digital ID as everyone must now verify their age.
The post Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:32 | Ben Pile
Is banning the burps of bullocks worth risking our bollocks? That the question posed by the decision to give Bovaer to cows to 'save the planet', says Ben Pile, after evidence suggests a possible risk to male fertility.
The post Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Labour's Leaflet lies

category national | eu | opinion/analysis author Tuesday June 10, 2008 01:18author by Galway woman Report this post to the editors

I just got a leaflet through the door from Labour today calling for a Yes vote. It is worse that I could have guessed.


One outright lie which I found infuriating is this:

"The right to give state aid to companies and in particular, to public services is not changed by Lisbon"

If they had actually bothered to check the Lisbon Treaty, and other EU directives and laws that will not be overturned by Lisbon, they would know that this was obviously not the case. For example:

Article 87 of the Treaty states: "Save as otherwise provided in the Treaties, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources which
distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain goods, shall insofar as it affects trade between Member States be incompatible with
the internal market".

Other relevant parts of the Treaty:

Article 98 of the Lisbon Treaty states that "The Member States and the Union will act in accordance with the principle of an open market economy with
free competition."

Article 3 gives EU leaders "exclusive competence" (i.e. control) in "the establishment of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the
internal market".

[i.e. the EU will be making the rules, not the individual member states]

Protocal 6 states that this reference to the internal market "includes a system ensuring that competition is not distorted"

The business employers group IBEC, which is calling for a yes vote, is looking on privatisation as a good business opportunity. They have said about the Lisbon Treaty "A yes vote for the Lisbon Treaty creates the potential for increased opportunities for Irish business particularly in areas subject to increasing liberalisation [i.e. privatisation] such as Health, Education, Transport, Energy and the Environment

For more information on privatisation and the neo-liberal agenda see http://www.caeuc.org/index.php?q=node/319 and http://www.caeuc.org/index.php?q=node/8 and http://www.caeuc.org/files/HealthLib.pdf

Just a few other interesting things from the Labour Leaflet.

"Europe's laws will be required to be socially proofed to protect citizens. Your public services are also safeguarded"

(Ahem, no they will not be)

Also from the leaflet.

"Europe will play a major role in the eradication of Global Poverty and will take the lead in making our planet a fairer place for all"

But Article 188 of the Treaty gives the EU Commission power to negotiate with agencies such as the World Trade Organisation [which is promoting "free-trade" economics and the privatisation of public services, which devestates "third world" economies] and negotiate a common commercial policy. Countries will not be able to veto the results of these negotiations in most cases.

Article 188d states the EU's negotiating stance will be based on "the achievement of uniformity in measures of liberalisation" ["liberalisation" means pro-free market, and pro-privatisation].

The EU has recently been pushing for the "liberalisation" not just in the EU but also in Africa, the Carribean and Pacific countries, with whom they have been negotiating economic agreements.

The Labour Party leaflet also boasts that we will have:

"Guaranteed help from our EU partners in the event of a natural or man-made disaster or terrorist attack in Ireland"

If our government wasn't supporting US terrorism we wouldn't under any threat from anti-US-terror-terrorists, and in an EU with a pro-NATO foreign and defence policy we will be even more vulnerable. Also interesting that they don't mention that if other EU states have this obligation to us, we also have it to them.

The leaflet tells us:

"More transparent decision-making by Ministers who must act in public, not behind closed doors as at present"

Great, so now they can screw us more publicly. Arem't they kind of admitting here that the EU is full of shady deals behind closed doors? Why would we trust these people?

The leaflet also states:

"Tackling Climate Change is put on a legal basis. As a Union of 27 developed countries we can set the pace in addressing global warming"

A snails pace I think. The Lisbon Treaty says this about climate change:

Article 174 shall be amended as follows:

(a) in paragraph 1, the fourth indent shall be replaced by the following:

"– promoting measures at international level to deal with regional or worldwide

environmental problems, and in particular combating climate change.";

So measures to combat climate change will only be "promoted" in the Lisbon Treaty.There is no extra obligations etc. on states other than those that already exist under other treaties and laws. And neo-liberalism and free market economics, where the market need is put above everything else, is incompatable with environmentalism.

Contrast this weak statement on climate change, with the Lisbon Treaty's, much more definite pronouncements on military defence:

"Member States shall undertake progressively to improve their military capabilities. The Agency in the field of defence capabilities development, research, acquisition and armaments (hereinafter referred to as "the European Defence Agency") shall identify operational requirements, shall promote measures to satisfy those requirements, shall contribute to identifying and, where appropriate, implementing any measure needed to strengthen the industrial and technological base of the defence sector, shall participate in defining a European capabilities and armaments policy, and shall assist the Council in evaluating the improvement of military capabilitie

and the support for NATO, for example. e.g.

EU defence policy will "respect the obligations of certain Member States, which see their common defence realised in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)... and be compatible with the common security and defence policy established within that framework

and "a more assertive [European] Union role in security and defence matters will contribute to the vitality of a renewed Atlantic Alliance"

[i.e. an alliance with the US in security and defence matters].

[If you want to find references to NATO in the Lisbon Treaty, download the document from www.lisbontreaty2008.ie . If you don't have any tool bar showing when you download the document - as if it wasn't hard enough to try to read! , you might first have to (a) click View on the top of the page.(b) Then go to Tool bars and then (c) the Show tool bars and click.

Once the tool bar is up go up to the top where there is a box with "find" written in it, do a search for North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (also you can click on the little arrow near this find box which gives you a menu and you can do a Full Readers Search, which seems to pick up more references for things. Do a search also for Atlantic Alliance.

I hope this doesn't sound too complicated, it took me a while to figure out how to turn the pages, and to do a quick search for key words, as the tool bar didn't show up when I downloaded the treaty!]

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   You got it wrong again ...     Desmond O'Toole    Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:57 
   Question!     paul o toole    Wed Jun 11, 2008 13:41 
   You can lead a Labour Party member to the Treaty but..     Galway woman    Wed Jun 11, 2008 19:33 
   labour and lisbon     margaret    Fri Jun 20, 2008 14:34 


 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy