News from down the country

Tuesday April 14, 2009 20:23

by Contaminated Crow

Two landfills, a sludge treatment plant, a LNG terminal and powerlines

Members of Cavan Better Waste Management met the EPA’s director of environmental enforcement last week to discuss their concerns over the Corranure landfill and reported after the meeting that Corranure has been the cause of more complaints than any other landfill site in the country for the period January to March 2009. (Cavan Post 7/4/09, p.5).

Ballinasloe Environmental Alliance has dismissed the response by OneBio Ltd. –which is seeking permission to establish a sludge treatment plant next to Premier Proteins’ rendering plant at Poolboy- to a request for further information from Ballinsaloe Town Council, saying ‘it certainly goes no way to alleviate the fears upon which our objections are based’. (Connacht Tribune 10/4/09, p.15).

The EPA is reported to be planning to take fresh legal proceedings against Clare County Council regarding its management of the landfill at Ballybegduff, near Inagh, Co. Clare. (Clare Post 7/4/09, p.2).

While the EU Petitions Committee has found that the government followed all planning procedures correctly in relation to Shannon LNG’s gas terminal, the Committee is now considering new issues placed before it by Johnny McElligott on behalf of Safety Before LNG (SBL), which said in a statement ‘The SBL group highlighted what it sees as a pattern of questionable behaviour by LNG developers throughout the Union. The group asked that the EU monitor and regulate more closely the specific challenges posed by the LNG industry.’ (Kerryman (sic), 8/4/09, p.31).

North East Pylon Pressure (NEPP) has accused EirGrid of releasing a ‘misleading’ press statement regarding the two days of talks between the company and NEPP last week, stating ‘EirGrid’s statement does not characterize the proceedings of the two days either accurately or fairly. It is irresponsible on their part to mislead the many thousands of supporters of NEPP who did not have direct access to what actually went on.’ (Meath Chronicle 11/4/09, p.3; Northern Standard 9/4/09, p.27).

A judicial review brought by EirGrid of an amendment to the Monaghan County Development Plan regarding high voltage lines has deemed it unlawful. The County Manager was criticized at last Monday’s County Council meeting for failing to enter a defence to the proceedings. (Northern Standard 9/4/09, pp. 1,14).

Last week a delegation from NEPP briefed the Northern Ireland Assembly’s Environmental Committee on the case for placing the powerlines for the north-south interconnector underground. (Northern Standard 9/4/09, p. 27; Meath Chronicle 11/4/09, p. 17).

EirGrid has published details of its preferred route for the proposed north-south interconnector, stretching in Co. Monaghan from Anayalla to the west of Doohamlet, passing between Lough Egish and Shantonagh before passing into Cavan to the east of Shercock and on to Kingscourt. The Mayor of Co. Monaghan denounced the political motivation behind the announcement, saying ‘an EirGrid representative told me that the news would help elected representatives, as the families and landowners affected would be reduced when three proposed routes become one preferred route, thereby containing political opposition to the plans’. (Northern Standard 9/4/09, pp.1,2).

save preference

Comments (4 of 4)

Galway fuel tanks

Sat Apr 18, 2009 22:39

Sorry Curious I haven't seen any critical comments on the demolition of the fuel tanks you mention but it's certainly worth keeping an eye on, as well as insisting on any required remediation works after the demolition is over. Best thing to do is contact the regulatory authorities (presumably the EPA, HSA and the docks authority) in the first place to find out what's planned, who's doing the work, to what international standards and what safeguards are in place. Then research the international standards and see if the actual plan matches up to them and the company carrying out the work to see what kind of record they have. Also, what research is to be done to see if remediation works are necessary. Good luck with it.

what happened to the water/fluids used to clean shell tanks in galway?

by Curious

Thu Apr 16, 2009 17:07

Hi Crow. keep up the good work!! It's appreciated.
Was wondering if you knew any details about the cleaning process for the huge galway docks fuel tanks?
Was wondering if they cleaned them conscientiously or if they cut corners to save money. I don't trust shell / topaz at all!

To "old codger"

by Ethniú

Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:04

I share your concern regarding the socially disastrous manner (as I see things) relating to the way ALL THREE of the main branches of our Government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) have handled the United Nations Aarhus Convention Agreement.

To me, this international agreement was potentially a very real and very powerful "gift" (of sorts) for genuine democracy, as well as a very powerful source of protection for all of our citizens (present and future) against the negative consequences of state-tyranny we have been experiencing in connection with environmental matters since the Republic of Ireland signed this Agreement in 1998.

In my view there simply has to be something terribly wrong with our Government in connection with the way it has handled the Aarhus Convention Agreement during the past 11 years or so, something which I believe very badly needs to be vigorously looked into by our lawyers without any further delay, and as a matter of urgency.

Signatories, Aarhus Convention Agreement, Republic of Ireland:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Signatories%2C+Aar...earch

Why are the people silent

by old codger - pensioner

Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:17

The Aarhus Convention agreement is a united nations agreement to enable citizens of all signitary countries to have a say on what happens in their localities and insists that governments and companiesTRUTHFULLY inform the public on any projects proposed in their localities. If they do not then they will be subjected to international law.
Ireland is a signitary but is the only Country not to rattify the agreement WHY?
THE PEOPLE MUST INSIST THAT FIANNA FAIL ANSWER THIS QUESTION.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Lockdown Skeptics

News from down the country

Comments (4 of 4)