Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
?Ulez Architect? and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary Fri Nov 29, 2024 17:38 | Will Jones One of the 'architects of Ulez' and a supporter of 20mph zones has been appointed as the new Transport Secretary?after Louise Haigh's resignation, raising fears the anti-car measures may become national policy.
The post ‘Ulez Architect’ and 20mph Zone Supporter Appointed New Transport Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:07 | Will Jones MPs have voted in favour of legalising assisted suicide as Labour's massive majority allowed the legislation to clear its first hurdle in the House of Commons by 330 votes to 275.
The post Assisted Suicide Set to Be Legalised as MPs Back Bill appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s Fri Nov 29, 2024 13:43 | Rebekah Barnett Australia is the first country to ban social media for under-16s after a landmark bill passed that critics have warned is rushed and a Trojan horse for Government Digital ID as everyone must now verify their age.
The post Australia Passes Landmark Social Media Ban for Under-16s appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:32 | Ben Pile Is banning the burps of bullocks worth risking our bollocks? That the question posed by the decision to give Bovaer to cows to 'save the planet', says Ben Pile, after evidence suggests a possible risk to male fertility.
The post Is Banning the Burps of Bullocks Worth Risking Our Bollocks? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Ed Miliband Phenomenon ? What Makes ?Britain?s Most Dangerous Man? Tick? Fri Nov 29, 2024 09:00 | Tilak Doshi With his zeal for impoverishing Britain and his imperviousness to inconvenient facts, Ed Miliband is Britain's most dangerous man, says Tilak Doshi. What makes fanatics like him tick?
The post The Ed Miliband Phenomenon ? What Makes ?Britain?s Most Dangerous Man? Tick? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?110 Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:01 | en
Verbal ceasefire in Lebanon Fri Nov 29, 2024 14:52 | en
Russia Prepares to Respond to the Armageddon Wanted by the Biden Administration ... Tue Nov 26, 2024 06:56 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?109 Fri Nov 22, 2024 14:00 | en
Joe Biden and Keir Starmer authorize NATO to guide ATACMS and Storm Shadows mis... Fri Nov 22, 2024 13:41 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Government on the ropes after election defeat
national |
politics / elections |
opinion/analysis
Tuesday June 23, 2009 14:13 by Socialist Party
Socialist Party defeats Fianna Fail and Sinn Fein
Analysis of Local and European elections and the aftermath. By Kevin McLoughlin
IN 2007 Bertie Ahern won a third successive general election, bringing Fianna Fail close to an overall majority. In 5 June Bye Election Ahern’s nominee, his hapless brother Maurice, came fifth in the Bye Election in the Dublin Central constituency which they had dominated for decades!
With 25.4% in the locals and 24% in the Euro’s, Fianna Fail got its lowest votes ever in national elections, losing eighty-four council
seats. They also lost one Euro seat and performed dismally in the two Dublin Bye Elections. The Greens won eighteen council seats in
2004 but came back with three this time, just reward for that party’s unprincipled grab for power.
As spectacular was the dramatic victory of the Socialist Party’s Joe Higgins. Joe heaped misery on Taoiseach Brian Cowen when he defeated sitting Fianna Fail MEP Eoin Ryan, for the final seat in the Dublin Euro constituency.
The Socialist Party also performed very well in the county council elections with Clare Daly, Ruth Coppinger and Joe Higgins elected in Fingal and Mick Barry elected in Cork North Central. The party got over 22% of the first preference vote in Swords; 18% in Mulhuddart; 28% in Castleknock and 26.5% in Cork North Central. Taking all the eight local wards together where our ten council candidates stood, we got an impressive 13.5% of the total valid poll. Despite polling very well our councillor in Tallaght, Mick Murphy, narrowly lost his seat.
Very importantly, the party also won two additional positions with Frank Gallagher elected to Drogheda Town Council and Terry Kelleher to Balbriggan Town Council.
The final outcome of the elections were: Euro Elections – 12 MEPs; FF 3; FG 4; LP 3, SP 1 and 1 Ind. County Councils – 883 seats; FF 218; FG 340; LP 132; GP 3; SF 53; SP 4; PBPA 5 and 128 Independents or Others. Fine Gael easily won the Dublin South By Election. Significantly, Maureen O’Sullivan, the Gregory Candidate, beat the establishment parties in the Dublin Central Bye Election.
Can the government survive this crushing defeat? Will the gains for Fine Gael last and in particular will the electoral growth of Labour make any difference for working class people?
The elections also saw important victories for socialists including the Socialist Party, the Tipperary Workers and Unemployed Action Group, the People Before Profit Alliance, the Workers Party and other independent lefts. How can these local successes be used to help in the campaign to build a new mass party for working class people?
The hatred for Fianna Fail on the doorsteps was the defining characteristic of these elections. More than one in every three people who voted for Fianna Fail in 2007 deserted them this time. Fianna Fail’s vote in the locals in Dublin was down 6.5% on the disastrous vote they got in 2004 local elections.
Its number of councillors in Dublin was reduced by more than a third. Out of 130 councillors in the four Dublin councils, Fianna Fail has a paltry eighteen. In Cork city they lost five councillors and are left with six out of thirty one. In Limerick they have just three out of fifteen and in Waterford they have only one councillor out of fifteen.
The Greens won ten council seats throughout Dublin in 2004, today they have none. If the results were repeated in a general election all six Green TDs would face losing their Dail seats. The real probability of a complete annihilation at the polls if they continue in government, may force the Greens to look for an issue around which they could exit and try to regain some credibility.
Economic crisis
These election results were fashioned by the economic crisis. People correctly blamed Fianna Fail for the crisis. In addition, the vote showed there is little support for their policy of slashing pay and public spending. How the crisis develops will continue to be the crucial factor in determining how the different parties and forces will do in the years ahead.
On that score talk of "green shoots of recovery" in the Irish economy is a cruel joke. Consumption and economic activity are still declining rapidly, as are imports, signifying a big drop in domestic manufacturing which is being badly hit by the high value of the Euro.
The austerity measures of the government will make conditions even worse for ordinary working people. It is a chilling prospect that the Minister of Finance in effect predicted that more than 600,000, over 25% of the workforce, would be unemployed before the end of 2010!
On the basis of worsening conditions a significant recovery of Fianna Fail is not on the cards. In the general election people are likely to be more desperate than ever to get rid of them and as a result it is entirely possible that the results for Fianna Fail could be even worse. Events can spin out of control and we have to be prepared that a general election could nearly happen at any time.
The main beneficiaries of the hatred of the government at this point are Fine Gael and the Labour Party, up by 5% and 4.5% respectively on the last general election. A significant portion of those who had supported Fianna Fail over the last decade have switched to Fine Gael at this point and it is the biggest party in council seats and in the opinion polls.
Is Labour an alternative?
Labour has increased its representation in the urban centres and now hold 45 of the 130 council seats in Dublin. They are behind Fine Gael in Limerick but neck and neck with them or ahead in the cities of Cork, Waterford and Galway in terms of council positions.
Labour is a key player on many of the main councils but that doesn’t mean there is any prospect of left wing, fighting councils. Instead, regardless of their rhetoric on certain issues, in these crisis times services for working class people will be attacked and undermined, including where Labour is dominant.
The boost for Fine Gael and Labour says more about the intense hatred of Fianna Fail than indicating deep illusions in either of the official opposition parties. Neither has been in power since 1997 and the memory of that unpopular government or their disastrous coalition in the 1980s, has understandably faded.
If the results of the local and European elections were repeated in the next general election, Fine Gael and Labour would have a comfortable majority in the Dail. Such a government would be a right wing, anti working class administration. That is not just because Fine Gael are likely to be a majority. It is also because Labour is part of the capitalist establishment.
Some may have the hope that in the context of this extreme capitalist crisis that Labour may, under pressure from working class people, return to a left position. People had huge hopes in New Labour in Britain but look what was delivered!
Labour ceased to be a workers’ party in any meaningful way during the 1990s and it has moved ever further to the right under successive new leaders, capitulating completely to the capitalist market. Its connection to the working class is gone and there is no committed left wing in the party.
In power any radical policies that have inadvertently remained in policy documents will be discarded. Rather than reflect the aspirations of ordinary people Labour would heed and act on the pressure from big business interests who will demand that the policy of making ordinary working people pay for the crisis is continued.
In the context of economic crisis, honeymoons don’t last very long and such an administration would likely become unpopular quickly. If in powerm it is inevitable Labour will sell out and that will have a big impact on society and will create the conditions for a dramatic shift to the left and for the building new broad left/socialist party to challenge the establishment parties and help build the support for a socialist solution to the crisis of capitalism.
In preparation for such a future opening, well before the local elections, the Socialist Party put forward very positive proposals that should have led to the establishment of a genuine left slate of candidates for the Local Elections. We were disappointed that others on the left didn’t fully engage or respond favourably to our proposal and as a result an opportunity was missed.
It is a mistake for the newly elected People Before Profit Alliance (PBPA) councillors to refer to Labour and Sinn Fein as left wing when plainly these parties are committed to implementing capitalist market policies. In a disgusting attack on union organisation and workers rights, Gilmore recently argued that public sector should not take action against the government’s austerity programme.
By not only referring to Labour and Sinn Fein as left, but also being open to an alliance and deals with them on the councils, PBPA is potentially giving support to those who will attack working class communities. Such statements will re-enforce illusions that may exist in these parties rather than pointing towards the need for a new mass left party. This mischaracterisation of what a left party and programme is needs to be resolved otherwise there is a real danger that the attempts to build a new party will fail.
Joe Higgins defeats FF
The victory of Joe Higgins in the Euro Election was by far the biggest gain for the left and the working class in these elections. The result was greeted with huge enthusiasm particularly in Dublin. 50,510 first preference votes or 12.4% is an incredible result for a campaign that had only a fraction of the resources of the main candidates.
Our defeat of Mary Lou McDonald was a huge blow to the Sinn Fein leadership and capped off a poor election for them, particularly in Dublin. As well as the MEP position, they lost three council positions in Dublin. However, within a couple of days, their longest serving councillor Christy Burke resigned from the party in Dublin. A couple of days later a John Dwyer from New Ross, who got 5,000 first preference votes for Sinn Fein in the 2002 general election, also resigned.
Joe was elected on a clear socialist programme which we outlined constantly in the media, on our leaflets and via our excellent campaign website. Joe’s main leaflet distributed to over 200,000 homes called for the nationalisation of the banks and major building companies, under the democratic management of working people as the start of a state housing plan. We called for "a socialist Europe, where the wealth and resources are publicly owned and democratically run, to provide for the needs of people not profit" and much else besides.
Joe’s election was exceptional, but it does give an indication of the potential that will emerge more generally, particularly if Labour is in a crisis-ridden government. A number of crucial factors came together at the right time.
The record of Joe Higgins and of the party itself over years in major struggles - defeating water charges, fighting the bin tax – being sent to prison, involvement in countless workers struggles like GAMA, were absolutely crucial factors.
The opposition that Joe put forward in the Dail between 1997 and 2007 to Fianna Fail was also vital. More than anyone Joe exposed and warned of the crisis that their policies and greed would lead to, and events have dramatically vindicated his and the party’s views. If people wanted to rebuke the capitalist greed that caused this crisis, Joe Higgins was clearly the most obvious candidate.
Even with such potential, a vibrant campaign is necessary to give people the confidence to turn out and that their vote can make a difference. The second Irish Times opinion poll was an important factor but it was only able to have an impact because we had already increased our support and developed a momentum since the first opinion poll.
It wasn’t that 50,510 voters fully endorsed socialism but, there is no doubt that everyone who voted for Joe, knew well that they were voting for a socialist. In the exit poll, when asked why they had voted for Joe Higgins, 48% said because of his personality/personal qualities; 29% because of his policies and 18% because he was the Socialist Party candidate. The poll also indicated that, of those made redundant over the last six months who voted, 32.4% voted for Joe Higgins.
Clearly an aspect of what people are referring to as Joe’s personal qualities are directly related to his political views and his campaigning record. In other words Joe Higgins and the Socialist Party were paid back for its characteristic of consistently fighting for working class people. Obviously many who voted for Joe don’t agree with our full socialist programme, but that wasn’t a barrier. In fact clearly many people appreciated our/Joe’s honesty in sticking to our principled socialist views, many referring again and again to Joe’s integrity.
Socialist policies & fighting record
What is clear is that at this point it would have been very difficult for any other left wing figure, belonging to any other party to pull off this victory. It was exceptional result that related to the conditions of crisis and record and policies that Joe as a Socialist Party rep had fought on over many years. It couldn’t just be replicated in every area, if things were that easy, the left would already be a mass force. However, it does give an indication of future gains that can be achieved on a more general basis as conditions change and if the correct approach is adopted.
The Socialist Party welcomes the election victories of the five People Before Profit Alliance councillors to Dun Laoghaire/Rathdown, South Dublin and Dublin City Councils. We welcome the two county councillors elected for the Tipperary Workers and Unemployed Action Group; the seat won on Carrick-on-Suir Town Council and the five seats the action group won on Clonmel Borough Council. We also welcome the independent left and Workers Party councillors elected in Dublin, Waterford and Cork.
These gains are important and on the basis of the councillors and groups pursuing the right policies and a fighting approach, they can make a real difference for working class people in these communities. While fully appreciating the significance of these victories, it is important to be balanced when projecting or speculating about the general significance of these results.
The vote for the left candidates mentioned above indicates a deeper base of support in those particular areas than in 2004 and that made the difference in the election of a group of new councillors. However, in the context of society these gains as a whole do not constitute a seismic shift or an historic breakthrough for the left or the working class generally at this point.
While all the left councillors have important roles to play, they still only number less than twenty nationally out of a total of 883 elected county councillors. In Dublin the combined votes of the Socialist Party, the PBPA and independent left are roughly similar to what was achieved by candidates linked to the anti bin tax campaigns five years ago.
Things are clearly moving forward but there hasn’t as yet been a dramatic general shift to the left yet. There is still a low level of political activity amongst working class people and the focus of significant sections of the working class is still to look towards Labour, as a way of stopping the attacks of the government.
In many countries over the last years, premature initiatives to try to force the building of new left wing parties have invariably either failed or hit major problems. We need to try to avoid such problems here as false starts actually can delay the whole process. Without the active and real involvement of fresh layers of the working class and youth, most of the new left initiatives have collapsed or gone to the right politically and thereby defeating the whole purpose of the initiative.
Of course there can and should be intermediary campaigns or alliances, like the one we proposed above, on the road to building a new party, but until there is the emergence of new activists generally, building a new left is not really possible.
The left must now use all elected positions won to fight on the issues and to explain the need for a new party. Joe Higgins used many important media opportunities during the election to do precisely that. The Socialist Party is fully committed to use its positions, including that of the MEP seat, to push forward and help in the re-organisation of the working class and youth in the communities, in the workplaces and politically, in preparation for the inevitable opportunities that will emerge to build a new broad mass party of the working class.
Right now the focus needs to be on building and organising real mass resistance and struggle to the draconian attacks that this government is implementing which are not only destroying the lives of ordinary people but will make the crisis and unemployment even worse. This government has been weakened by the election defeats and if united working class people have the power to push them back.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (13 of 13)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13Well worth reading it has interesting points to make that I haven't read or heard other lefts making since the election, especially what it says about the Labour Party not being left.
"Our defeat of Mary Lou McDonald was a huge blow to the Sinn Fein leadership and capped off a poor election for them, particularly in Dublin."
We went into the election with 51 Council seats and came out with 54 (Not the 53 stated in your post). Absolutely the loss of Mary Lou was a blow and we would have hoped to do better in the political context that existed but coming back with more City and County Council seats than we went into the election with is not something I'd describe as poor.
If we included Town and Borough Council seats, we also made gains on a number of those Councils across the State but though you include that information for the SP, you don't for anyone else.
"...they lost three council positions in Dublin."
Four actually.
"However, within a couple of days, their longest serving councillor Christy Burke"
Christy was our longest serving councillor in the 26 Counties, not our longest serving councillor.
Otherwise an interesting enough analysis.
My understanding is that:
Sinn Fein won 54 seats in the 2004 local elections. That went down as they lost a significant number of councillors over the five years, some of whom were replaced by other SF councillors, some of whom were not. Sinn Fein also won 54 seats in the 2009 local elections. So they had the same number of councillors elected as last time. Their overall percentage of the vote in the local elections was slightly down, despite standing more candidates. Sinn Fein lost a European Election seat. However in these elections their overall vote was slightly up.
A very sober and realistic analysis (albeit a tad on the pessimistic side for general consumption, as opposed to distribution amongst activists. But then I guess most voters aren't going to be seeking out detailed analyses anyway, so no harm done.)
I agree with pretty much everything therein, but I would have to demur with certain conclusions regarding the Labour Party. The inference seems to be (forgive me if I've misinterpreted anything, the heat has gone to my brain) that the election and subsequent failure of a government including the Labour Party would result in a shift to left alternatives. If anything, the lesson of these elections across Europe is that the failure of social democratic governments/parties resulted in a shift to the right, presumably due to the lack of visibility and/or plausibility of genuine left alternatives.
I'd be interested to hear views from the Socialist Party or elsewhere regarding that apparent trend, and how it can be combated here before the situation arises.
You're 100% right. Our local vote down slightly, our Euro vote up slightly.
We elected 54 city and county councillors in 2004 and this dropped to 51 over the five years with people like Daniel Callinan or Annette Spillane for example (Both of whom I take great delight in saying lost their seats) going independent.
We went into this election therefore with 51 seats and came out with 54, an increase of three on what we went into the election with. We also increased our number of town and borough councillors by a few, not sure how much but not enough to set the world on fire.
It wasn't a good election for us. In the political climate that existed we should have done better. But at a local authority level we more or less held our own across the state. Losses in Dublin and Wexford for example balanced out by gains in Wicklow, Mayo and Cavan. Rumours of meltdown from our opponents on the right are a long way from accurate.
Still, congrats to the SP. Obviously would have preferred to take the seat but in a choice between Eoin Ryan and Joe Higgins I'm very relieved about the way it came about. Even a reactionary petit-bourgeois nationalist like me can see that.
"If anything, the lesson of these elections across Europe is that the failure of social democratic governments/parties resulted in a shift to the right, presumably due to the lack of visibility and/or plausibility of genuine left alternatives."
The two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. A poor performance by Labour could see a shift to the right and also a shift to the left, what political correspondents are fond of calling a 'shift to the extremes' although we don't have the right wing version of the BNP here (Excluding the DUP in the North).
It's about being placed to reap the benefit of the political shift in voters. Labour were placed to benefit from it this time. Joe Higgins and the SP and PBP to a lesser but not insignificant extent. In 2004, Sinn Féin was best positioned to benefit from it.
In theory a botched Labour/FG coalition government could see those Labour voters splintering. Some stay with Labour. Some move to or back to Fianna Fáil and some swing to or back to left alternatives such as SF, SP, PBP.
I appreciate that viewpoint, Jonah, but I think it tends to interpret the election results as a reflex action rather than a deliberate political statement on behalf of the electorate. Namely, "If we must have have unhindered capitalism (and all the major parties say we must), let's at least vote for people who won't do it half-arsed."
The failure of a Labour-inclusive coalition would be framed by FF/FG (del. as appr.) and the media as a failure of the left. Erroneous though that conclusion would be, it would hold some sway with the electorate. I don't think hoovering up a handful of disillusioned Labour voters would do much to counteract it.
My recollection of the Labour meltdown in 97 is far from pristine, but I seem to remember it benefitting overwhelmingly the mainstream right-wing parties and independents, with one obvious exception.
Turlough, I think that Jonah is broadly speaking correct.
A problem facing the left in the near future is the existence of Fine Gael and Labour as a ready made alternative government. A really angry swing against the government is likely to, at least mostly and at least for a period, go towards this government in waiting. Fine Gael and Labour have no better ideas for dealing with the economic crisis than Fianna Fail and the Greens and they are unlikely to prove any better as a Coalition. However, simply by existing, verbally opposing government actions, and having the requisited presence, spread and machine, they will benefit from people's anger in the run up to an election.
There is absolutely no reason to assume that disgust with any government will automatically result in a swing to the left. Across Europe, I think that we mostly saw swings to whoever was well placed to offer an alternative government. There is a big difference between blaming a government for the crisis and concluding that the problem is the capitalist system itself. It is our responsibility, as socialists, to convince people feeling the former of the latter and that isn't always easy.
There are significant opportunities for the left at the moment. There are a lot of angry people out there and the government are going to annoy them a lot more. There will be struggles against cuts in services, pay cuts, lay offs, a possible water tax and so on. Unemployed is already high and it continues to rise fast. At the same time, confidence in capitalism as a system has been undermined by the financial crisis. We have the opportunity to campaign actively alongside a large number of workers and to argue for a socialist transformation of society on a much larger scale than we had up until very recently.
But we shouldn't lose the run of ourselves and think that an MEP and twenty County Councillors mean that there is a huge left shift in society already underway. We have to be aware of the difficulties we face as well as the opportunities. Fine Gael and Labour will, on the electoral front at least, pose one such difficulty. Labour in particular for the left, because it is mostly urban, like the left, and because it still has more of a working class vote than Fine Gael.
If Fine Gael and Labour do get into power, there may be a honeymoon period where they can shield themselves by blaming their predecessors for the crisis, but as they continue to attack the living standards of working class people they will, unless there is some global economic recovery, quickly start to lose support. Part of the left's task over the next period is to ensure that it is in a position to offer an alternative to people disgusted with all of the main political parties. We don't have a crystal ball, but we do have to consider the likely situation ahead as we plan our strategies.
...but I'm just a bit wary of over-prioritising the Labour Fuck-Up Gambit. The electorate appear to have short memories, and Fianna Fáil's infinite capacity to present itself as all things to all men would probably stifle any move to the left. In fact, a disastrous FG/Lab/Oth administration could result in the nightmare scenario - an FF majority government. Given that modern Irish governments seem to share the generalissimo's ability to survive indefinitely on life-support, FF's crimes may recede even further into the distance.
I guess my other concern would be that the current government's assault upon the working class may grow so savage (to use Joe's favourite adjective) that the incoming administration will need only to roll back the very worst of it to placate leftish sentiment.
But on the broader point, you are of course right. In a sense it doesn't matter how and when the opportunity arises, the right preparation will be adaptable to any circumstances.
good article in general. Probably is a bit more on the pessimistic side given we all have a pep in our step these days, but at least is balanced and realistic, no point in overstating things or getting carried away in terms of a shift to the left. In fairness, thats why I like (most) SP articles. Also refreshing that, despite obvious political differences and persuasions, this debate is fraternal and polite, a change from the usual.
keep it up
Turlough, you are completely right that we shouldn't take for granted that disappointment with a Labour/Fine Gael government will necessarily lead to a shift towards the socialist left. There are no guarantees in politics.
But if all of the major parties of Irish capitalism get a chance in quick succession to deal with the crisis and if all of them disgrace themselves in trying to do so then that presents Socialists with an opportunity. If things play out like that, which they may not to do of course, then it is up to us to put the socialist left in a position to take advantage of that opportunity in the meantime.
Concur with all the points raised. Sorry to have been so long-winded about a minor point, it's an old habit.
I agree it is far from automatic that the left will be the ones to gain from the disillusionment with a Fine Gael and Labour Government. The left has to struggle to provide an alternative and prevent a shift to the right but then again this can't just be achieved by wishful thinking it has to be based on a concrete reality. There needs to be ordinary working class activists who are prepared to build a new left and right now that just doesn't exist outside of a small number. It is a process that will arise organically from struggles by the working class. People struggling in their workplaces, communities and trade unions will seek to overcome the lack of political representation for the working class. Right now there is very little struggle apart from some small localised campaigns. The anger of the working class towards this government and the system needs to move from being passive to being active. It is then when we will see the basis for building a new left force.
It is definitely not going to come about by arguing that Labour and Sinn Fein are left which is what PBP are saying. This is very dangerous because it sows illusions in these parties who are at some point going to go into coalition with the big establishment parties and prop up anti-working class governments. That group will not get very far if this is the direction they are moving towards!