New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Linking Research Funding to ?Robust? Promotion of DEI Poses Serious Risk to Research Quality and Aca... Mon May 05, 2025 13:09 | Will Jones
Almost 200 professors and lecturers have written to the Government criticising DEI plans to link research funding to "robustly" promoting diversity, saying they are a serious risk to research quality and academic freedom.
The post Linking Research Funding to “Robust” Promotion of DEI Poses Serious Risk to Research Quality and Academic Freedom, Over 200 Professors and Lecturers Tell Government appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link WHO Finds Mobile Phone and WiFi Radiation Causes Cancer Mon May 05, 2025 11:00 | Gillian Jamieson
The WHO has found that electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones, smart devices and WiFi can cause cancer in animal experiments, in an astonishing volte-face, says Gillian Jamieson.
The post WHO Finds Mobile Phone and WiFi Radiation Causes Cancer appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Dale Vince Says Ecotricity Has Received ?Net Zero? in State Subsidies, but His Definition of ?Subsid... Mon May 05, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison
Dale Vince insists Ecotricity isn't subsidised, yet has pocketed over ?100 million in taxpayer cash ? just don't call it a subsidy, says Chris Morrison.
The post Dale Vince Says Ecotricity Has Received ?Net Zero? in State Subsidies, but His Definition of ?Subsidies? is a Little Narrow appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link What Does Renaud Camus Actually Believe? Part One: Is He Really a Neo-Nazi? Mon May 05, 2025 07:00 | Steven Tucker
Steven Tucker defends French philosopher Renaud Camus as a disillusioned leftist exiled for committing the unforgivable sin of noticing Europe's demographic upheaval ? and daring to name it.
The post What Does Renaud Camus Actually Believe? Part One: Is He Really a Neo-Nazi? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Mon May 05, 2025 01:02 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en

offsite link Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en

offsite link The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Why I As A Muslim Woman Don't Wear A Headscarf

category international | gender and sexuality | other press author Thursday April 14, 2011 18:15author by Lamya Kaddor Report this post to the editors

Lamya Kaddor confronts the myths regarding the wearing of the Hijab. She shows that this is not an observance required by Islam. Rather it is an invention of misogynistic mullahs. Full text at link.

However, if God had required a special head covering, would He not have said so explicitly? The khimâr thus merely constitutes a 'fashion accessory' according to the spirit of that age. Viewed rationally, functions consciously or unconsciously associated with head coverings across the course of history – such as protection against sand or evil influences – are all superannuated today and have lost their validity. People's powers of imagination have changed.
Lamya Kaddor
Lamya Kaddor

Today's orthodox comprehension of the obligation to wear a head covering is primarily based on the interpretations of scholars who lived several generations after the Prophet Mohammed. One can follow their judgements but they are not sacrosanct. As human beings all scholars are fallible. Conservative and fundamentalist circles constantly emphasise that our behaviour should follow the Koran and the Prophet. Their spokesmen maintain that this directly accords with what was laid down during the Prophet's lifetime and the initial period of Islam.

However in reality this view is mainly based on the ideas of scholars who lived some 600 (!) years later – such people as Ibn Qudâma (d. 1223), Ibn Taymîya (d. 1328), or the latter's pupil Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzîya (d. 1350). Bearing in mind the patriarchal social structures of that time, it is unsurprising that interpretations of sources concerning relations between the sexes were usually unfavourable for women – even though that contradicts a striving (to be found throughout the Koran) towards improving women's situation.

Related Link: http://www.countercurrents.org/kaddor140411.htm

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   koran never said anything about wearing this ridiculous costume     V for vendetta    Thu Apr 14, 2011 23:17 
   Face-Veil Ban: Mixed Muslim Reactions     Yoginder Sikan    Sun Apr 17, 2011 13:31 


 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy