A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds Mon Jun 16, 2025 17:30 | Will Jones
The Establishment has been in "denial" over the ethnicity of grooming gangs and repeatedly relied on flawed data to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as "sensationalised, biased or untrue", a report has found.
The post Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat Mon Jun 16, 2025 15:29 | Toby Young
We're having another fund-raising drive at the Daily Sceptic, so please make a donation if you value our work. We're also launching a new Substack ? the Climate Skeptic ??that you can also support.
The post Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Pakistan ?Will Nuke Israel if Netanyahu Uses Nuclear Weapons Against Tehran?, Iran Claims Mon Jun 16, 2025 13:00 | Will Jones
Pakistan?has threatened to drop a nuclear warhead on?Israel?if?Benjamin Netanyahu?uses nuclear weapons against?Iran, according to a top Iranian officer ? though Pakistan has denied the claims.
The post Pakistan “Will Nuke Israel if Netanyahu Uses Nuclear Weapons Against Tehran”, Iran Claims appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
How Nuclear Power Might Save The Day Mon Jun 16, 2025 11:18 | Sallust
The Telegraph has published an interview with a 32 year-old scientist called Tim Gregory who argues that decarbonisation needs a total rethink. Only nuclear could achieve it, he says ? anything else is wishful thinking.
The post How Nuclear Power Might Save The Day appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
How Covid Killed the Rule of Law Mon Jun 16, 2025 09:00 | Nick McBride
The UK's Covid response tore up the rule of law, bulldozed rights and showed a nation frighteningly willing to surrender its freedoms, argues Nick McBride.
The post How Covid Killed the Rule of Law appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
international |
miscellaneous |
opinion/analysis
Saturday January 21, 2012 17:01
by Rob Brotherton
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3I am a believer in some of the wilder Conspiracy Theories, like the one that they made up the story about Weapons of Mass Distruction in Iraq...... I know, 'crazy' right! Coming in at number 645 on my list of conspiracies is the belief that our ESRI here in Ireland is just a Government mouthpiece, using it's 'scientific' research to provide proof for whatever the Government policy of the day is. The ESRC which you are working for on this 'survey' would be a sister organisation to our own ESRI
http://www.esrc.ac.uk/
So, no thanks, I don't want to give you an insight into my psychology because ..... well.... lets just say I don't think our governments are working for the general good of our populations and more specifically I seriously doubt they are studying the very people who question their incessant lies to help us. Help demonise us morelike.
1. Would it be fair/accurate or correct to say that you are conducting research into the psycholoogy of conspiracy theorists, as opposed to the psychology of conspiracy theories? It may seem like a semantic point, however, I think it is important.
2. Can you let me know the context of your research: what is the title/subject matter of your Phd?
3. Is the model/theory you are using a social one or a therapy-type, individual psychological state-type one?
4. What is your definition-for the purposes of your research-of a conspiracy theory?
Thanks.
Hi there, huge thanks to whomever posted this here for me, and massive thanks to anyone who has filled in the survey.
To respond to the questions above...
1. While I wouldn't say I'm looking at the psychology of 'conspiracy theorists', it is certainly correct to say I'm looking at people's beliefs rather than at conspiracy theories themselves. My work has no implications for the objective truth of any particular claim of conspiracy, nor is it intended to. Rather I'm interested in how people come to hold the beliefs that they do, whether it is believing a conspiracy or disbelieving a conspiracy.
2. My entire PhD is concerned with belief (and disbelief) in conspiracies
3. My research methods are based in experimental psychology - experimental in the sense that I conduct empirical research, as opposed to offering therapy. I'm look for general trends in the population, rather than examining individuals.
4. The definition of conspiracy theory is a complex issue! The short answer is 'the assumption of conspiracy when other explanations are more probable'. If you have 25 minutes to spare you can listen to me speak about defining conspiracy theory in much greater depth here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6s_Jw3RU9g