Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy Human Rights in Ireland >>
Hate Cleric Raises £3 Million to Create Islamic Homeland on Scottish Island Sun Jul 28, 2024 13:01 | Richard Eldred A radical cleric has raised over £3 million to transform a remote Scottish island into a self-governing Islamic state with its own army, justice system, school and hospital.
The post Hate Cleric Raises £3 Million to Create Islamic Homeland on Scottish Island appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why I Fear What Labour Will Do to the Education System Sun Jul 28, 2024 11:00 | Stephen Curran We are facing a radical agenda set by the progressive wing of the educational establishment, says Dr Stephen Curran. We should build on the past 14 years' foundation, not tear it down.
The post Why I Fear What Labour Will Do to the Education System appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Labour Has Just Betrayed a Generation of Young People Sun Jul 28, 2024 09:00 | Richard Eldred By dropping the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, the Education Secretary has declared war on the culture of free speech on campus. The fight-back starts here, says Claire Fox in the Telegraph.
The post Labour Has Just Betrayed a Generation of Young People appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Extreme Weather We?re Experiencing Is Not Man Made, According to the IPCC Sun Jul 28, 2024 07:00 | Mark Ellse Day-to-day weather, with all its extremes, is "just weather", according to the IPCC. With their authority onside, we can shrug off the BBC's melodramatic climate reports and misinformation, says Mark Ellse.
The post The Extreme Weather We?re Experiencing Is Not Man Made, According to the IPCC appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Sun Jul 28, 2024 01:17 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Irish Indymedia & the Technical and Ideological Apparatus of Activism
national |
anti-capitalism |
feature
Monday November 10, 2003 21:23 by Marc Mulholland
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
Extract of Story from the Newswire:
"The leaders of the various leftist groups have decided not to participate in a site they regard as beneath their dignity. They know that they will be attacked by ireful posters in disrespectful and probably vulgar and abusive terms. The rank and file of the various vanguard revolutionary parties are obviously discouraged from going to have a look-see. Those who do speak-up for their parties usually (though not always) sign on anonymously.
Comment on content is mostly sect-ish point scoring. This can be entertaining, though more often boring and obscure. There are sometimes vigorous and illuminating debates. Even these, however, tend to be very limited in scope. The median Indymedia contributor despises the market, barely accepts that democracy exists, and assumes that the most malevolent motives move all 'bourgeois' and 'imperialist' politicians.
It's a pity that the project was not much more broadly based politically, but I suppose the zealots are always going to colonise these fora and drive out the less committed.
In all, though, I think the evolution of written word publishing has had interesting effects on the far-left, with potentially far-reaching effects. I’ll elaborate . . . . ."
Irish Indymedia and thoughts on the Technical and Ideological Apparatus of
Activism
Irish Indymedia is an oddly vociferous place. It was set up as a site to collate
reports derived from amateur activists and participants rather than the
established media.
News stories are mostly press releases advertising planned demonstrations, or
fulsome reports by the organisers afterwards. Here one can find hard to come by
information. Generally, however, they are of relatively little interest, and not
a serious alternative to the established media at all.
Much more fun is to be found in the comments section. Those who regularly
contribute seem fairly few in number and dispersed between the SWP, the
Socialist Party, anarchists and the odd Sinn Feiner. A very few liberals /
conservatives / libertarians sally in to have crack with redbaiting. However,
Indymedia's readership and contributor base must be far bigger than any of the
left-wing party newspapers in Ireland (with the exception, possibly, of AP/RN -
Sinn Fein's newspaper).
The leaders of the various leftist groups have decided not to participate in a
site they regard as beneath their dignity. They know that they will be attacked
by ireful posters in disrespectful and probably vulgar and abusive terms. The
rank and file of the various vanguard revolutionary parties are obviously
discouraged from going to have a look-see. Those who do speak-up for their
parties usually (though not always) sign on anonymously.
Comment on content is mostly sect-ish point scoring. This can be entertaining,
though more often boring and obscure. There are sometimes vigorous and
illuminating debates. Even these, however, tend to be very limited in scope. The
median Indymedia contributor despises the market, barely accepts that democracy
exists, and assumes that the most malevolent motives move all 'bourgeois' and
'imperialist' politicians.
It's a pity that the project was not much more broadly based politically, but I
suppose the zealots are always going to colonise these fora and drive out the
less committed.
In all, though, I think the evolution of written word publishing has had
interesting effects on the far-left, with potentially far-reaching effects. I’ll
elaborate.
When I was involved in the Militant, we used to laboriously produce leaflets
with mechanical gestettner machines. Papers & pamphlets were painfully and
expensively produced by skilled designers and compositors. All this served to
put the technology of practical ideological dissemination far out of the reach
of the 'rank and file'. It simply took too much skill and effort to put together
and publish a credible pamphlet without the aid of the 'organisation'. (I did
manage it twice, but both times had no means to distribute them - being too
embarrassed to push them myself).
The leadership cabal had a monopoly on the publication of 'perspective'
documents. As they constructed the various canonical documents, they gained that
mastery over understanding and exposition that comes from writing.
Writing is far more important in developing ideas than is oral debate. The
leadership would always affirm that the ideas 'emerged' from a process of
debate. If so it was like Mao's Zedong's 'Mass Line'. Mao
argued that the piecemeal and scattered ideas of the rank and file should be
gathered together by the Communist leadership, which then cogitated, shaped and
composed them into 'theorised' knowledge. This line, in turn, was to be
delivered back to masses as their own clarified thought. Something similar
happened, in microscopic scale, within the various ‘revolutionary parties’. It
was not real democracy. In fact, real debate requires multiple sites of focussed
reflection. It requires multiple writers. Otherwise, as was always the case, the
leadership, in writing up documents, had an invincible advantage in establishing
their hegemony.
This stage of the ultra-left (mid -1980s) - the un-Reformed stage where a
priesthood controlled all access to the Holy Book of publishing - began to
transorm with the emergence of cheap and easy desk-top publishing (early 1990s).
The impact of this was, on the one hand, to facilitate the emergence of
factions, capable of producing and maintaining their written 'platforms' and
congealing into permanent petty parties. Monoliths like Militant began to
fragment. The Anarchist alternative to Leninist parties began to proliferate.
On the other hand, single-issue 'fronts' assumed a certain independence from
their Leninist sponsors as they had easy access to their own means of
ideological propagandising and organisation. 'United Frontism' took on a new
substance and permanence. (A few, such as ‘Black Panther’ in Britain, broke from
the organisation that had sponsored them).
The hard-left world seems recently to have been further revolutionised by
internet publishing - even cheaper, easier and more accessible that DTP. Most
obviously, it gives a voice to every dissident. For this snowstorm of criticism,
there is an audience in and around every vanguard sect like the SWP, SP or
whatever. The Leninist leaders have ever greater difficulty in insulating their
members. The Weekly Worker has made a huge impact on
ultra-left by appearing free on the net every week. As a scandal sheet of the
leftish sects, it is hugely popular with the activists. No leadership cabal is
now safe from the most searching and often violent critiques (though they employ
the familiar rhetorical and organisational measures to minimise the damage).
The internet makes access to alternative ideas much easier for the rank and file
of the ultra-left groups. More importantly, it allows many more sub-leadership
individuals to set down their thoughts and ideas in connected prose, a process
that has huge potential to expose internalised assumptions to critique. To read
is one thing, and its subversive effects can be countered by party leaderships.
But to write is really to force oneself to think through ideas. Particularly if
such scribblings are instantly published on the WWW, there is created the
psychological conditions necessary to generate that self-regard required to
unhitch oneself from self-effacing respect for the leadership's 'understanding
of theory'.
All this, I think, threatens the semi-cultish hold the leaderships of leftist
groupuscules have historically exercised over their memberships. It seems to
have fuelled the factionalism of parties such as Militant over the past 15 years
or so. Now, arguably, it is creating a genuine cadre - right across the party
divides of the ultra-left – which inclines towards abandoning the ego-centred
shibboleths of their petty party leaders in favour of constructing a broader
left unity. It is a revolution from below, or the middle ranks anyway. So far it
is incomplete and prone to local reverses, due to the bureaucratic manipulations
of united fronts by the like of the SWP (who have massively weakened, for
example, the Anti-War Movement).
Initiatives like the Socialist Alliance and the Scottish Socialist Party have
many explanations, including the plans and ambitions of Leninist leaders. But it
also indicates the release of an activist constituency from the serfdom of
vanguard party loyalty and their consequent availability as organisers of a
potentially much wider hard-left electorate. The Anti-War Movement - even if
variegated - indicates something of the potential scale. Opinion polls
suggest that the united ultra-left in France would attract serious consideration
from some 31% in presidential elections. More realistically, maybe somewhere
between 10% and 20% in contemporary western societies would support
anti-capitalist environmentalist movements, if not actually 'socialist
transformation'.
There are many causes for all this. But one should not ignore those mundane
transformations of the means of production, distribution and communication that
activists directly rely upon. They have the capacity to produce significant
shifts in the superstructure of activist politics. Bill Gates is the unwitting
father of the new New Left.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (62 of 62)