New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.  We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below). 

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

The slate is not clean at University College Cork

category national | rights, freedoms and repression | news report author Tuesday March 06, 2007 19:14author by Stuart Report this post to the editors

A clean sweep or déjà vu, again?

The new president of University College Cork, Dr Michael Murphy, has been quick off the blocks to establish a rapport with the media and reassure his audience that the new presidency, executive and governing body can be trusted going forward. But what about the past, what about the very serious allegations raised against UCC and what about the repercussions of the Malone Report? Any attempt to sweep the many outstanding matters at UCC under the carpet is likely to further inflame the situation
Trouble in Toytown
Trouble in Toytown

The Irish Times today (06/03/2007) firmly declares that all eyes are on the future and that there will be no judgement on the past, saying that the new president "acknowledges how UCC has been damaged by the recurring controversies". Dr Murphy is quoted as having concern about UCC's reputation being harmed "by having some of our internal debates taking place outside UCC - I would hope that the natural controversy that you must have in any university will be conducted within UCC." There are better phrasings to emphasise that the damage to UCC has been caused by wrongdoing, not by public exposure.

On the one hand this could indicate a determination to ensure that all disputes are adequately handled by internal procedures and that staff will not be forced to call on external agencies. Dr Murphy says he is "committed to ensure all views on all matters can be dealt with internally... My job is to strengthen the internal process." This commitment was evidenced during his first stint at the Governing Body on the 6th February when he quietly ushered in a new Higher Education Authority 'Code of Governance for Irish Universities' and established a Working Group on Governance. He outlined an induction programme for governors and the need to reform the Governing Body Committee Structure, the University Statutes and the University management structures and processes. He also called for an overhaul of the woefully poor communication and interactions between the Governing Body and the Academic Council, the University Management Group, the University staff and the external world.

On the other hand, he says that he "expects loyalty from staff and students to their colleagues", without having first established the trust and authority necessary to command that loyalty. He is "anxious to signal that his appointment represents a clean slate, a break with the rancour of the past for everyone in UCC." This expands on Dr Murphy's statement in the UCC Express (27 February 2007) that "I would hope that we will have processes in place over the coming year to make sure that our internal battles stay internal from now on". This could cynically be interpreted as a threat to enforce a code of loyalty and silence, because it is not accompanied by tangible commitments to deal with past abuses of power at UCC.

In the Irish Times of 2 March 2007, Dr Murphy said that "it was now time to move on and look to the future". In the UCC Express he summed up his intentions to act on Mr Malone's Report by saying "that GB here would consider it, and then pass it to the HEA and then obviously recommendations that are made have to be acted on. Now, in fact, I took the position at the last GB that a lot of things should be acted on during the honeymoon period. I would suspect that what Malone would do is validate the reasons for doing the right thing for the right reason."

Other UCC officials have echoed this stated intent to move forward without taking responsibility for the past. One stated "We as a Governing Body are moving forward and leading the way for a new era in UCC. The new president has taken that initiative and is leading us into the future and while lessons can be taken from the past. I do think its best to look forward now and improve in any way we can." Another stated "I think giving the new Governing Body and President a chance would be good. What is past is past and very little can be done about it now."

The Malone Report

The outcome of the Malone Report has been widely published and discussed in the media already. Sean Flynn of the Irish Times began with a report of a leaked favourable summary of the report prepared by someone in UCC under the headline "Inquiry clears ex-UCC head of corruption" saying "An inquiry into allegations levelled against the former University College Cork (UCC) president Gerry Wrixon has found no evidence of corruption or breaches of the law". (Irish Times, 02/02/2007).

This was a very different take to that by the Irish Examiner some days later, who reported on the complete report headlined "Report highlights mistrust and animosity at UCC" saying "structural changes at UCC, prompted by Prof Wrixon, may have been introduced too quickly to accommodate all the college's key staff - there was truth in some of the allegations probed - a number of allegations were correct but that all of them were of a minor nature - however, when considered collectively, some of them give a very poor impression of the university" while noting that there was no corruption and the mismanagement investigated was not sufficiently serious to warrant the statutory appointment of a Visitor. (Irish Examiner 03/02/2007).

Matters took a much more serious twist when Mary Raftery of the Irish Times reported under the headline "Minister's blind eye in UCC row" on UCC's effective control over the investigation process, UCC's establishment of the remit, UCC's selection of the investigator and UCC's limitation on the matters covered by the investigation. Her article states that "a number of the allegations put forward by Professor Clarke are correct both in substance and fact …. collectively they do not convey a good impression and they certainly highlight a lack of awareness and, in some cases, a disregard for process and procedures. The number of instances where short cuts have been taken, where procedures have not been used or have not worked is a matter of concern." She also quoted "serious deficiencies in pursuing these reforms, particularly the failure to win the hearts and minds of the staff. He criticises the lack of leadership from the governing body, describing it as incapable of acting in a collegial manner". (Irish Times, Thursday 08/02/2007). The references to an abject failure of the Department of Education and the Higher Education Authority to ensure adequate standards of probity in public life infuriated Gerry O'Sullivan of the HEA into a petulant letter to the Irish Times (Letters, 16/02/2007) complaining about "the wider issue as to whether due process and the public interest are best served by this kind of public comment on a leaked report", neglecting that public disclosure was effected by a modified version of the report leaked by elements within the university in the first place.

Mary Raftery summed up by saying that UCC's appointment of the process to investigate its own wrongdoing was "both dangerous and damaging. It creates the unpleasant precedent of allowing public bodies under investigation to have an unhealthily large say in how and by whom they are to be scrutinised. It also sends a message that legal powers are not required for such a process."

Many would wholeheartedly agree with Mr O'Sullivan that the HEA must now ensure compliance with "its role in ensuring that there are strong, clear and open mechanisms of oversight and accountability in universities". This must start with an objective, transparent and accountable reaction to the Malone Report and all the other outstanding allegations about University College Cork. A muted agreement is echoed by the Governing Body minutes recognition of "the necessity for a review of the communication and interactions framework between the Governing Body and Academic Council, the University Management Group, University staff and the external world" and "the need to review University management structures and processes".

Cleaning the slate

It might suit UCC's new administration to claim that all of these issues are just so much water under the bridge, or (with an ironic twist of injustice) to say that all of this evil-doing was directly attributable to bad old Wrixon, who is now history. The senior administration staff have changed, but the new incumbents must address the clear and undisputed wrongdoing of their predecessors. UCC remains the same legal entity with the same legal liabilities and the same unresolved issues, which this executive is responsible for resolving.

The slate is not clean. A judgement must be delivered on the past. That judgement must be objective, transparent and accountable in order to earn the loyalty Dr Murphy demands.

Further reading ….
Eyes on the future rather than a judgment of the past http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/education/2007/0306/11....html
In pursuit of excellence: In his first interview as President, Dr Michael Murphy discusses the college's future http://www.ucc.ie/en/SIN/Communications/UCCExpress/Expr...n.pdf
Inquiry clears ex-UCC head of corruption http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2007/0202/1170....html
Report highlights ‘mistrust and animosity’ at UCC http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2007/02/03/story24...3.asp
Minister's blind eye in UCC row http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/opinion/2007/0208/1170....html
Row at University College Cork, by Gerry O'Sullivan, Head of Information at the HEA http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/letters/2007/0216/inde....html
More article links http://www.geocities.com/stuartdneilson/UCC_Reference.htm

…. and those allegations

It is worth revisiting the allegations made by Professor Clarke and others over past years. These include:

DISHONESTY: University spokespeople have claimed on numerous occasions that allegations about UCC's conduct have been examined and discounted by the Governing Body, the Higher Education Authority and the Department of Education and Science, but HEA chief executive Tom Boland wrote "I can confirm that the HEA has not carried out an inquiry into the allegations and any reports to the contrary are incorrect"; The university has claimed that investigators of bullying / harassment complaints "are senior, experienced, have previously found against alleged bullies, and have no personal attachment" yet there is no evidence that any case has ever been upheld, investigators have directly conflicts of interest and have been personally accused of (and settled in confidence) cases of bullying / harassment; A UCC spokesperson claimed that the university had chosen to cancel its insurance against litigation in 2004 after assessing the cost implications whereas President Wrixon stated to the PAC "Insurance cover is no longer available to us", Deputy Burton "Why has such cover been refused? Was it because the level of claims against the university was deemed to be high?", Professor Wrixon "Yes"; President Wrixon confirmed to the HEA on 8/3/2004 that he was "not a professor" and to the High Court on 13/1/05 that he was a professor at UCC appointed before 1997; President Wrixon told the PAC that UCC incurred legal costs over staff disputed of 125,000 per year, whereas this has been estimated to be an eighth of the real value, which may run (including settlements and other costs) into more than 10 million over his presidency and has been widely reported in the media at 3.3 million euro; President Wrixon claimed at the PAC hearing that "We have one major ongoing legal case which has been covered by our insurance policy" whereas the actual number is very much higher than one.

GOVERNMENT BY DIKTAT: There were breaches of procedure, the autonomy of the Governing Body was over-ruled by the President, the Chairman and nonmembers; Vital information was refused to Governing Body members.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND APPOINTMENTS: One person (Joe Gantly) was simultaneously associated with UCC as an employee, a Governing Body member, member of the Audit Committee, venture capitalist, chair of the Restructuring Steering Group and a stakeholding beneficiary of UCC business dealings; Failure to adhere to requirements for fair and open appointment and promotion procedures; Absence of evidence of claimed qualification by staff; False claims of academic qualifications.

THE DEFICIT: The Auditor Mr Purcell stated that the unfunded capital deficit amounted to 21.7 million euro at the end of September 2002, that it had doubled to 42 million euro by November 2004 and that UCC's capital debt is equal to the combined capital debts of all the other Irish universities (PAC Dec 2005); UCC has reported officially to the HEA that current debts exceed 100 million euro but that this is partially discounted by expected (but as yet unearned) income from fee-paying students in medicine.

FINANCIAL ISSUES: Various unanswered questions about the deficit and management of the pension fund; The Victoria Lodge student apartments contract; A 160,000 euro restrospective "donation" to the Glucksman Gallery; Consultants fees and duties; An apartment provided for the president's "use" in breach of public sector guidelines; Approval for the establishment of the Tyndall Institute.

LITIGATION EXPENSES: In addition to the 3.3 or 10 or however many million in legal fees and settlements, former president Professor Mortell was threatened with legal action; Three staff have alleged bullying by senior UCC management; and unknown number of additional cases are in train.

BULLYING: UCC has refused to enumerate the number of complaints of bullying / harassment, how many were upheld, how much has been expended on legal fees, staff replacement and settlements, how many staff take stress-related sick leave, nor even to confirm whether UCC ever upheld a complaint of bullying / harassment; Unlawful procedures (in Fanning v. University College Cork, June 2005 the judgement declared that UCC breached the law and its own statutes in a number of ways, and acted ultra vires); People (including President Wrixon, Professor Hyland and Professor Perry) who have been accused of bullying, and in some cases settled in confidence, have been appointed to investigate bullying cases and to the university's welfare and equality committee with responsibility for administering bullying policy.

author by NBpublication date Tue Mar 06, 2007 20:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The University College Cork Governing Body minutes for the meeting before last (these only come courtesy of the SU) were discussed on the Forum at UCC (FUCC - http://bb.ucc.ie) and say:

The 'Code of Governance for Irish Universities' issued in January 2007 by the HEA was adopted and it was agreed that the University should aim to enhance the standards set by the Code. The full text of the Governance Code is available at the following LINK (http://secretary.ucc.ie/governingbody/Reports/Reports20...s.doc)

The President made a short presentation in which he highlighted the following specific issues:
· The HEA Code of Governance
· The importance of an induction programme for governors
· The need to reform the Governing Body Committee Structure
· The need to reform University Statutes
· The necessity for a review of the communication and interactions framework between the Governing Body and Academic Council, the University Management Group, University staff and the external world
· The need to review University management structures and processes


The minutes of 27/02/2007 would be more interesting - the Report of the Independent Person, Mr John Malone, had been circulated to members of Governing Body and will be considered at the reconvened meeting of the Governing Body on 27 February 2007

Student Union: http://www.ucc.ie/en/SIN/UCCSU/GoverningBodyReports/

author by NBpublication date Thu Mar 08, 2007 18:19author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The latest governing body minutes (27 February) were posted today and contain the amusingly cryptic point number 9: It was noted that this was the last Governing Body meeting to be attended by Mr. Robin Graham, Secretary/Chief Legal Officer who was wished well in his new position. The President informed the Governing Body that Mr. Michael Farrell, Administrative Secretary, will act in the role of University Secretary whilst a management review is underway and a permanent appointment made.

That he "was wished well" neatly encapsulated a variety of feelings both expressed and unexpressed ....

http://www.ucc.ie/en/SIN/UCCSU/GoverningBodyReports/Gov...0207/

author by Stuartpublication date Thu Mar 08, 2007 20:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

NB said the 'Code of Governance for Irish Universities' issued in January 2007 by the HEA is available at http://secretary.ucc.ie/governingbody/Reports/Reports20...s.doc

My browser tells me "You are not authorized to view this page - You do not have permission to view this directory or page from the Internet address of your Web browser" and it seems the entire "secretary" domain at UCC is forbidden (I can't even view the list of GB members) and that the Higher Education Authority is not making this document available either. It is a shame that they do not make both the Malone Report and the Code of Governance publicly available - especially given that everything that both documents refer to is already publicly available (right here on http://www.indymedia.ie, for starters!).

Still, big thanks to the Students' Union for providing the Governing Body minutes, and all the material about ongoing events at University College Cork in the UCC Express newspaper at http://www.ucc.ie/en/SIN/Communications/UCCExpress/Expr...0607/

author by Miriam Cottonpublication date Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:12author address author phone Report this post to the editors

From the error message I have received when I tried to access that same section of the site, to look at highly sensitive information (student fees) I was specifically told that my IP address was on a list of addresses that had been banned. UCC appear to have singled certain people out. Would there be any connection between the banning of my IP address and the publication of my reports on Indymedia? By any chance?

author by Just noticedpublication date Mon Apr 16, 2007 15:10author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The long-running thread on Professor Clarke's UCC "corruption" allegations at http://bb.ucc.ie/viewtopic.php?t=9114 has been deleted after 15,000 viewings of 210 postings. Cached copies are available....

And poor old "Professor" Wrixon is also being gradually expunged, appearing as just Wrixon, Gerard - Retired - g.wrixon@ucc.ie in the staff directory.

On a serious note, if UCC just airbrushes out the "corruption", then it can learn nothing because it admits no error, and the whole ugly process will re-emerge with greater force. Like the Hydra, or like mushrooms after the rain.

author by Stuartpublication date Wed May 30, 2007 19:39author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Jo Gantly and corporate governance, again. There is a High Court judgement of November last year between the Chief Executive Officer of the National Institute of Bioprocessing, Research and Training (NIBRT), Kurt Naujoks, and the head of the board of management, Joe Gantly. Naujoks claims conflict arose because of his own ‘commitment to ensure compliance with the best standards of corporate governance’ while Gantly claims Naujoks’ management style had led to ‘serious human resources issues’.

It is interesting that similar issues arise in unrelated enterprises in relation to the same individual.

Judgement:
http://www.courts.ie/judgments.nsf/23fd4a34bad801d98025...93769

Business Post:
http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2006/12/17/story196...6.asp

NIBRT:
http://www.nibrt.ie

author by Busybodypublication date Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:06author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Joe Gantly "steps down" from chairmanship of the disastrous attempt to float out a hugely profitable state asset, now that he has been firmly put in his place. Presumably he will trot into obscurity with the rest of the herd of "colourful" characters that have created so much misery in academic and business life in Cork.

Governing or administering UCC over the past number of years seems to have put a black mark on many who might have expected a few tasty board memberships and state appointments.

Joe Gantly - persona non grata?
Joe Gantly - persona non grata?

author by Bibinyepublication date Tue Apr 30, 2019 15:49author email author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Michael Murphy became president of UCC in 2007.
In 2012 Michael Murphy was reported as complaining/empathising with salary cuts. His salary at the time was €232,000.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/life-is-a-struggle-on-232000-says-university-president-26895973.html

This salary comes with additional allowances for expenses and possibly allowances for housing.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/president-of-indebted-university-enjoying-the-high-life-26642781.html

In 2008 it was decided that the ideal person for the role Director at the Jennings Gallery was Sioban Murphy, Michael Murphy's wife.
In 2014, someone came with the business need for Visual Thinking Strategies at UCC, and this was passed by senior officers or committees. The ideal person chosen to be the Programme Director was Sioban Murphy.

Michael Murphy is now back to being a 'professor' in a department. Although he is not in the department of international relations or alumni, he is pictured attending events in places such as Singapore. The pictures of him with the glass of alcohol in his hand were deleted recently.
https://www.facebook.com/UCCAlumniNetwork/photos/a.1874185065970826/1874185085970824/?type=3&theater

The current president Patrick O'Shea lives in a luxury development in Cork which UCC pays €3000 a month for. There may be additional allowances such as for housekeeping.
https://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/ucc-pays-3000-a-month-for-presidents-housing-471084.html

Mr O'Shea's wife lives in the USA. Despite this, it is likely that at €3000 a month, the apartment UCC pays for Mr O'Shea to rent is large. Mr O'Shea's wife and other family members have appeared at UCC events wearing the UCC logo. Mr O'Shea was judged the best fit for the role despite that it meant such a set-up, one which the ordinary people paying the tax funds would hardly be advised or able to follow and expect that the tax system would fund it. There is the likelihood, at least one might hope, that Mr O'Shea is travelling by plane to the USA very often, and his wife and family to UCC, possibly claiming expenses for this. A number of FOI requests on the subject of expenses have been refused recently.

UCC applies for awards such for being 'Green'.
These awards, similar to QS ratings (a private profit making company), are based around information the institutions provide.

http://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/what-is-greenmetric/

"Creating the ranking
We are inviting thousands of universities around the world to take part. These universities include many which already have a presence in other World Universities Rankings, such as THES-QS, Webometrics, and Shanghai Jiao Tong ranking. Universities that wish to participate are asked to provide numeric data on a number of criteria that can give a picture of their commitment to the greening of their campus and putting in place environmentally friendly policies that support sustainability. The criteria include such baseline information as the size of the university, both spatially and in terms of population, the campus location and the amount of green space; and also information on energy use, transport, water use and recycling and waste treatment. In addition, it will ask about efforts being made by the institution towards establishing green policies and management.

Participating
It is easy to take part. Universities can submit data by filling in our online survey form. The process is relatively simple and not terribly time consuming. We believe that the short time and small effort put in will more than reward all those who are interested in sustainability issues. The period for submitting data through the online form will run from the present up to near the end of the year. We will then calculate the scores for all the universities who have submitted data and publish the resulting rankings in December."


The questions asked and information submitted include things reusable coffee cups and are very unlikely to include matters such as whether the president travels by plane to another continent regularly, and whether or not staff commute by plane to work. Some senior employees paid much over €100,000 do not live in Ireland. They effectively commute to work by plane, because there are no defined and/or enforced hours of attendance.

More links and evidence of the complete abuse of public money to follow.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy